Spine surgery in geriatric patients: Sometimes unnecessary, too much, or too little
- PMID: 22276241
- PMCID: PMC3263001
- DOI: 10.4103/2152-7806.91408
Spine surgery in geriatric patients: Sometimes unnecessary, too much, or too little
Abstract
Background: Although the frequency of spinal surgical procedures has been increasing, particularly in patients of age 65 and over (geriatric), multiple overlapping comorbidities increase their risk/complication rates. Nevertheless, sometimes these high-risk geriatric patients are considered for "unnecessary", too much (instrumented fusions), or too little [minimally invasive surgery (MIS)] spine surgery.
Methods: In a review of the literature and reanalysis of data from prior studies, attention was focused on the increasing number of operations offered to geriatric patients, their increased comorbidities, and the offers for "unnecessary" spine fusions, including both major open and MIS procedures.
Results: In the literature, the frequency of spine operations, particularly instrumented fusions, has markedly increased in patients of age 65 and older. Specifically, in a 2010 report, a 28-fold increase in anterior discectomy and fusion was observed for geriatric patients. Geriatric patients with more comorbid factors, including diabetes, hypertension, coronary artery disease (prior procedures), depression, and obesity, experience higher postoperative complication rates and costs. Sometimes "unnecessary", too much (instrumented fusions), and too little (MIS spine) surgeries were offered to geriatric patients, which increased the morbidity. One study observed a 10% complication rate for decompression alone (average age 76.4), a 40% complication rate for decompression/limited fusion (average age 70.4), and a 56% complication rate for full curve fusions (average age 62.5).
Conclusions: Increasingly, spine operations in geriatric patients with multiple comorbidities are sometimes "unnecessary", offer too much surgery (instrumentation), or too little surgery (MIS).
Keywords: Geriatric patients; instrumentation; minimally invasive; spinal surgery; unnecessary.
References
-
- Bowers C, Amini A, Daialey AT, Schmidt MH. Dynamic interspinous process stabilization: Review of complications associated with the X-Stop device. Neurosurg Focus. 2010;28:E8. - PubMed
-
- Campbell PG, Yadia S, Malone J, Zussman B, Maltenfort MG, Sharan AD, et al. Early complications related to approach in cervical spine surgery: Single-center prospective study. World Neurosurg. 2010;74:363–8. - PubMed
-
- Campbell PG, Malone J, Yadla S, Maltenfort MG, Harrop JS, Sharan AD, et al. Early complications related to approach in thoracic and lumbar spine surgery: A single center prospective study. World Neurosurg. 2010;73:395–401. - PubMed
-
- Davis H. Increasing rates of cervical and lumbar spine surgery in the United States, 1979-1990. Spine. 1994;19:1117–23. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources