Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2012 Oct;27(10):1243-50.
doi: 10.1007/s11606-012-1986-8. Epub 2012 Jan 26.

Impact of automated alerts on follow-up of post-discharge microbiology results: a cluster randomized controlled trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Impact of automated alerts on follow-up of post-discharge microbiology results: a cluster randomized controlled trial

Robert El-Kareh et al. J Gen Intern Med. 2012 Oct.

Abstract

Background: Failure to follow up microbiology results pending at the time of hospital discharge can delay diagnosis and treatment of important infections, harm patients, and increase the risk of litigation. Current systems to track pending tests are often inadequate.

Objective: To design, implement, and evaluate an automated system to improve follow-up of microbiology results that return after hospitalized patients are discharged.

Design: Cluster randomized controlled trial.

Subjects: Inpatient and outpatient physicians caring for adult patients hospitalized at a large academic hospital from February 2009 to June 2010 with positive and untreated or undertreated blood, urine, sputum, or cerebral spinal fluid cultures returning post-discharge.

Intervention: An automated e-mail-based system alerting inpatient and outpatient physicians to positive post-discharge culture results not adequately treated with an antibiotic at the time of discharge.

Main measures: Our primary outcome was documented follow-up of results within 3 days. Secondary outcomes included physician awareness and assessment of result urgency, impact on clinical assessments and plans, and preferred alerting scenarios.

Key results: We evaluated the follow-up of 157 post-discharge microbiology results from patients of 121 physicians. We found documented follow-up in 27/97 (28%) results in the intervention group and 8/60 (13%) in the control group [aOR 3.2, (95% CI 1.3-8.4); p=0.01]. Of all inpatient physician respondents, 32/82 (39%) were previously aware of the results, 45/77 (58%) felt the results changed their assessments and plans, 43/77 (56%) felt the results required urgent action, and 67/70 (96%) preferred alerts for current or broader scenarios.

Conclusion: Our alerting system improved the proportion of important post-discharge microbiology results with documented follow-up, though the proportion remained low. The alerts were well received and may be expanded in the future.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Sample alert for post-discharge microbiology result.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Overview of study design.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Study flow diagram.

References

    1. Roy CL, Poon EG, Karson AS, et al. Patient safety concerns arising from test results that return after hospital discharge. Ann Intern Med. 2005;143:121–128. - PubMed
    1. Were MC, Li X, Kesterson J, et al. Adequacy of hospital discharge summaries in documenting tests with pending results and outpatient follow-up providers. J Gen Intern Med. 2009;24:1002–1006. doi: 10.1007/s11606-009-1057-y. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. El-Kareh R, Roy CL, Brodsky G, Perencevich M, Poon EG. Incidence and predictors of microbiology results returning post-discharge and requiring follow-up. J Hosp Med 2011. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wilson JW, Marshall WF, Estes LL. Detecting delayed microbiology results after hospital discharge: improving patient safety through an automated medical informatics tool. Mayo Clin Proc. 2011;86:1181–1185. doi: 10.4065/mcp.2011.0415. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gandhi TK, Kachalia A, Thomas EJ, et al. Missed and delayed diagnoses in the ambulatory setting: a study of closed malpractice claims. Ann Intern Med. 2006;145:488–496. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms