Incidence and progression of diabetic retinopathy during 17 years of a population-based screening program in England
- PMID: 22279031
- PMCID: PMC3322726
- DOI: 10.2337/dc11-0943
Incidence and progression of diabetic retinopathy during 17 years of a population-based screening program in England
Erratum in
- Diabetes Care. 2014 Mar;37(3):887
Abstract
Objective: To estimate the incidence of diabetic retinopathy in relation to retinopathy grade at first examination and other prognostic characteristics.
Research design and methods: This was a dynamic cohort study of 20,686 people with type 2 diabetes who had annual retinal photography up to 14 times between 1990 and 2006. Cumulative and annual incidence rates were estimated using life tables, and risk factors for progression were identified using Cox regression analysis.
Results: Of 20,686 patients without proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) or sight-threatening maculopathy at their first retinal examination (baseline), 16,444 (79%) did not have retinopathy, 3,632 (18%) had nonproliferative retinopathy, and 610 (2.9%) had preproliferative retinopathy. After 5 years, few patients without retinopathy at baseline developed preproliferative retinopathy (cumulative incidence 4.0%), sight-threatening maculopathy (0.59%), or PDR (0.68%); after 10 years, the respective cumulative incidences were 16.4, 1.2, and 1.5%. Among those with nonproliferative (background) retinopathy at baseline, after 5 years [corrected] 23% developed preproliferative retinopathy, 5.2% developed maculopathy, and 6.1% developed PDR; after 10 years, the respective cumulative incidences were 53%, 9.6%, and 11%. Patients with nonproliferative retinopathy at baseline were five times more likely to develop preproliferative, PDR, or maculopathy than those without retinopathy at baseline (adjusted hazard ratio 5.0 [95% CI 4.4-5.6]).
Conclusions: Few patients without diabetic retinopathy at the initial screening examination developed preproliferative retinopathy, PDR, or sight-threatening maculopathy after 5-10 years of follow-up. Screening intervals longer than a year may be appropriate for such patients.
Figures
References
-
- Scanlon PH. The English national screening programme for sight-threatening diabetic retinopathy. J Med Screen 2008;15:1–4 - PubMed
-
- American Diabetes Association Diabetic retinopathy. Diabetes Care 1998;21:157–159 - PubMed
-
- Royal College of Ophthalmologists Guidelines for Diabetic Retinopathy. London, Royal College of Ophthalmologists, 1997, p. 1–104
-
- Misra A, Bachmann MO, Greenwood RH, et al. Trends in yield and effects of screening intervals during 17 years of a large UK community-based diabetic retinopathy screening programme. Diabet Med 2009;26:1040–1047 - PubMed