Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Jun 7;279(1736):2151-6.
doi: 10.1098/rspb.2011.2468. Epub 2012 Jan 25.

Cooperative breeding and monogamy in mammalian societies

Affiliations

Cooperative breeding and monogamy in mammalian societies

Dieter Lukas et al. Proc Biol Sci. .

Abstract

Comparative studies of social insects and birds show that the evolution of cooperative and eusocial breeding systems has been confined to species where females mate completely or almost exclusively with a single male, indicating that high levels of average kinship between group members are necessary for the evolution of reproductive altruism. In this paper, we show that in mammals, the evolution of cooperative breeding has been restricted to socially monogamous species which currently represent 5 per cent of all mammalian species. Since extra-pair paternity is relatively uncommon in socially monogamous and cooperatively breeding mammals, our analyses support the suggestion that high levels of average kinship between group members have played an important role in the evolution of cooperative breeding in non-human mammals, as well as in birds and insects.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Mating systems in cooperative breeders (dark bars) and other social species (light bars). (a,b) In all cooperatively breeding mammals, a single female and a single male are the parents of the majority of all recruits. (c) Breeding males typically maintain their position for several breeding seasons. The values for cooperative breeders are significantly larger than those of other social species in all three comparisons (all p < 0.01). Horizontal bars represent the median, boxes the 75% quartile, and vertical lines indicate the minimum and maximum values.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Transition rates for the most likely phylogenetic reconstruction. The most likely model assumes a dependent, sequential evolution between monogamy and cooperative breeding. The values depict the transition rates between the four respective combined states; as transitions are sequential, only one trait changes at a time. No transition to cooperative breeding occurred if an ancestral species was not monogamous. In addition, transition rates away from the intermediary states (monogamy but no cooperative breeding, no monogamy but cooperative breeding) are always higher than the transition rates towards them, indicating that monogamy and cooperative breeding are unstable traits. The given values reflect the probability that a specific transition occurs, and depend also on the frequency with which certain states are present. Values are based on a model assuming equal branch lengths, all dependent models though estimate that there have been no transitions from non-monogamous, non-cooperative ancestors to cooperative breeding.

References

    1. Lewis S. E., Pusey A. E. 1997. Factors influencing the occurrence of communal care in plural breeding mammals. In Cooperative breeding in mammals (eds Solomon N. G., French J. A.), pp. 335–363 New York, NY: Cambridge University Press
    1. Hayes L. D. 2000. To nest communally or not to nest communally: a review of rodent communal nesting and nursing. Anim. Behav. 59, 677–68810.1006/anbe.1999.1390 (doi:10.1006/anbe.1999.1390) - DOI - DOI - PubMed
    1. Russell A. F. 2004. Mammals: comparisons and contrasts. In Ecology and evolution of cooperative breeding in birds (eds Koenig W. D., Dickinson J. L.), pp. 210–227 New York, NY: Cambridge University Press
    1. Clutton-Brock T. 2009. Structure and function in mammalian societies. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 364, 3229–324210.1098/rstb.2009.0120 (doi:10.1098/rstb.2009.0120) - DOI - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Emlen S. T. 1995. An evolutionary theory of the family. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 92, 8092–809910.1073/pnas.92.18.8092 (doi:10.1073/pnas.92.18.8092) - DOI - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types