Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Oct;27(4):525-31.
doi: 10.4103/0970-1591.91446.

How to appraise the effectiveness of treatment

Suzanne B Stewart  1 , Phillip Dahm, Charles D Scales Jr
Affiliations

How to appraise the effectiveness of treatment

Suzanne B Stewart et al. Indian J Urol. 2011 Oct.

Abstract

Introduction: Advances in treatment and disease prevention occur frequently in urology. Urologists must identify a framework within which to evaluate these therapeutic innovations.

Materials and methods: The evidence-based approach to critical appraisal is described using an example from the urological literature. A three-part assessment of the trial validity, treatment effect, and applicability of results will permit the urologist to critically incorporate medical and surgical advances into practice.

Results: Validity of clinical trials hinges upon balancing patient prognosis at the initiation, execution, and conclusion of the trial. Readers should be aware of not only the magnitude of the estimated treatment effect, but also its precision. Finally, urologists should consider all patient-important outcomes as well as the balance of potential benefits, harms, and costs, and patient values and preferences when making treatment decisions.

Conclusion: Use of this framework for critical appraisal will lead to a more evidence-based application of new therapies for patients. Incorporation of a more evidence-based practice within urology will lead to an increase in the quality of patient care.

Keywords: Dutasteride; evidence-based medicine; randomized controlled trial.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: None declared.

References

    1. Sackett DL, Rosenberg WM, Gray JA, Haynes RB, Richardson WS. Evidence based medicine: What it is and what it isn’t. BMJ. 1996;312:712. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Guyatt G, Rennie D, Meade MO, Cook DJ. 2nd ed. New York: The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc; 2008. Users’ Guides to the Medical Literature: A Manual for Evidence-Based Clinical Practice.
    1. Scales CD, Jr, Norris RD, Peterson BL, Preminger GM, Dahm P. Clinical research and statistical methods in the urology literature. J Urol. 2005;174:1374–9. - PubMed
    1. Scales CD, Jr, Norris RD, Keitz SA, Peterson BL, Preminger GM, Vieweg J, et al. A critical assessment of the quality of reporting of randomized, controlled trials in the urology literature. J Urol. 2007;177:1090–5. - PubMed
    1. Scales CD, Jr, Norris RD, Preminger GM, Vieweg J, Peterson BL, Dahm P. Evaluating the evidence: Statistical methods in randomized controlled trials in the urological literature. J Urol. 2008;180:1463–7. - PubMed