Influence of myocardial viability on responsiveness to cardiac resynchronization in ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy: a prospective observational cohort study
- PMID: 22281793
- DOI: 10.5152/akd.2012.039
Influence of myocardial viability on responsiveness to cardiac resynchronization in ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy: a prospective observational cohort study
Abstract
Objective: To understand whether patients with post-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy and myocardial viability (MV) could benefit from cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in terms of clinical, echocardiographic and neuro- hormonal parameters compared to patients without MV.
Methods: One hundred and four consecutive patients were enrolled in a prospective observational cohort study. Using dobutamine stress echocardiography, 2 groups were identified: group A of 51 patients with MV and group B of 53 patients without MV. All patients were implanted with biventricular pacing devices combined with an internal cardioverter-defibrillator. Clinical, echocardiographic and neuro-hormonal parameters were evaluated at baseline and at six month follow-up. Analysis of variance for repeated measures on each variable suggestive of remodeling was performed. We considered responder every patient with: decrease of > 15% in left ventricular volumes and/or improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction of > 5% in addition to NYHA class improvement.
Results: All the variables improved in both groups (time effect). Comparing the two groups (group effect), the following variables were significantly better in group A: N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (p=0.02), NYHA class (p=0.003), reverse remodeling (RR) (p=0.007), dP/dt (p=0.005), left ventricular ejection fraction (p=0.009), 3rd sound (p=0.01), and left ventricular end-systolic volume after the first week (p=0.035). RR occurred at the first week after CRT only in Group A and was maintained for all the time of this study. The maximum difference of the decrease of left ventricular volumes between the two groups occurred after the first week (p<0.001).
Conclusion: Patients with MV responded better than patients without MV with a significant improvement after the first week from CRT.
Comment in
-
Evaluating patients for CRT, what is relevant: identifying responders or estimating the amount of potential response?Anadolu Kardiyol Derg. 2012 May;12(3):276; author reply 277-8. doi: 10.5152/akd.2012.076. Epub 2012 Mar 13. Anadolu Kardiyol Derg. 2012. PMID: 22411141 No abstract available.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Medical
Research Materials