Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Jan 27:13:5.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2156-13-5.

Assessing the joint effect of population stratification and sample selection in studies of gene-gene (environment) interactions

Affiliations

Assessing the joint effect of population stratification and sample selection in studies of gene-gene (environment) interactions

K F Cheng et al. BMC Genet. .

Abstract

Background: It is well known that the presence of population stratification (PS) may cause the usual test in case-control studies to produce spurious gene-disease associations. However, the impact of the PS and sample selection (SS) is less known. In this paper, we provide a systematic study of the joint effect of PS and SS under a more general risk model containing genetic and environmental factors. We provide simulation results to show the magnitude of the bias and its impact on type I error rate of the usual chi-square test under a wide range of PS level and selection bias.

Results: The biases to the estimation of main and interaction effect are quantified and then their bounds derived. The estimated bounds can be used to compute conservative p-values for the association test. If the conservative p-value is smaller than the significance level, we can safely claim that the association test is significant regardless of the presence of PS or not, or if there is any selection bias. We also identify conditions for the null bias. The bias depends on the allele frequencies, exposure rates, gene-environment odds ratios and disease risks across subpopulations and the sampling of the cases and controls.

Conclusion: Our results show that the bias cannot be ignored even the case and control data were matched in ethnicity. A real example is given to illustrate application of the conservative p-value. These results are useful to the genetic association studies of main and interaction effects.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Marcus PM, Hayes RB, Vineis P, Garcia-Closas M. et al.Cigarette smoking, N-acetyltransferase 2 acetylation status, and bladder cancer risk: a case-series meta- analysis of gene-environment interaction. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2000;9:461–467. - PubMed
    1. Han J, Hankinson SE, Colditz GA, Hunter DJ. Genetic variation in XRCC1, sun exposure, and risk of skin cancer. Br J Cancer. 2004;91:1604–1609. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cox N, Frigge M, Nicolae DL, Concannon P, Hanis CL, Bell GI, Kong A. Loci on chromosomes 2 (NIDDM1) and 15 interact to increase susceptibility to diabetes in Mexican Americans. Nat Genet. 1999;21:213–215. doi: 10.1038/6002. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cordell HJ, Todd JA, Bernnett ST, Kawaguishi Y, Ferrell M. Two-locus maximum LOD score analysis of multifactorial trait: 7 joint consideration of IDDM2 and IDDM4 with DDM1 in type 1 diabetes. Am J Hum Genet. 1995;57:920–934. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cho JH, Nicolae DL, Gold LH, Fields CT, LaBuda MC, Rohal PM. et al.Identification of novel susceptibility loci for inflammatory bowel disease on chromosomes 1p, 3q, and 4q: evidence for epistasis between 1p and IBD1. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA. 1998;95:7502–7507. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.13.7502. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources