The role of the internal mammary vessels as recipient vessels in secondary and tertiary head and neck reconstruction
- PMID: 22284368
- DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2012.01.006
The role of the internal mammary vessels as recipient vessels in secondary and tertiary head and neck reconstruction
Abstract
Background: Successful microsurgical free tissue transfer for head and neck reconstruction highly depends on the quality of the recipient vessels. In most cases, vessels near the site of resection are available; however, when the bilateral vascular network in the neck is compromised or inaccessible due to prior surgery and/or irradiation, alternatives have to be sought.
Methods: Secondary or tertiary head and neck reconstruction was performed using the internal mammary vessels (IMVs) as recipient vessels in seven patients who had undergone previous neck dissection and radiation therapy. Indications were: tracheal-oesophageal fistula or stenosis (n = 4), oesophageal-cutaneous fistula (n = 1), saliva fistula (n = 1) and oral cancer (n = 1). Free flaps used for reconstruction were radial forearm flap (FRFF) (n = 5), anterolateral thigh flap (ALT) (n = 3) and transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap (TRAM) (n = 1). Within two patients an additional ALT flap was necessary for soft-tissue coverage and resurfacing of the neck. The IMVs were separately exposed in a standard fashion over the second or third rib. The pedicle of the flap was anastomosed anterograde and end-to-end to the recipient vessels in all cases. Mean pedicle length was 14.3 cm (11-20 cm), with a mean distance of 9.8 cm (7-13 cm) between the resection and recipient vessel site.
Results: All patients were tumour free at time of re-operation and no sign of radiation injury was observed in the recipient vessels. All flaps survived and all patients healed without major complications. Mean follow-up time was 18 months. Four patients died of local recurrence or distant metastases during follow-up.
Conclusion: In the vessel-depleted neck, the IMVs are a reliable and easy accessible recipient area for microsurgical reconstruction of the head and neck. Surgical management and technique refinements for dissection of the vessels are discussed. In combination with free flaps with a long pedicle, especially perforator flaps, vein grafts are unnecessary and microsurgery can safely be performed outside the zone of injury.
Copyright © 2012 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Transverse cervical vessels as recipient vessels in oral and maxillofacial microsurgical reconstruction after former operations with or without radiotherapy.World J Surg Oncol. 2015 May 14;13:183. doi: 10.1186/s12957-015-0576-8. World J Surg Oncol. 2015. PMID: 25966959 Free PMC article.
-
Utilization of Anterolateral Thigh Flap and Transverse Cervical Recipient Vessels for Head and Neck Cancer Patients With Former Neck Dissection and Irradiation: A Case Series Study.Ann Plast Surg. 2019 Apr;82(4):415-419. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000001647. Ann Plast Surg. 2019. PMID: 30516556
-
The radial forearm free flap as a "vascular bridge" for secondary microsurgical head and neck reconstruction in a vessel-depleted neck.Microsurgery. 2018 Sep;38(6):651-658. doi: 10.1002/micr.30259. Epub 2017 Nov 4. Microsurgery. 2018. PMID: 29105820
-
Internal mammary artery perforators as recipient vessels for free tissue transfer in head and neck reconstruction: A case report and literature review.Microsurgery. 2021 May;41(4):355-360. doi: 10.1002/micr.30680. Epub 2020 Nov 7. Microsurgery. 2021. PMID: 33159486 Review.
-
Microvascular reconstruction in the vessel depleted neck - A systematic review.J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2018 Sep;46(9):1652-1658. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2018.05.051. Epub 2018 Jun 7. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2018. PMID: 30196862
Cited by
-
Comparison of the surgical outcomes of free flap reconstruction for primary and recurrent head and neck cancers: a case-controlled propensity score-matched study of 1,791 free flap reconstructions.Sci Rep. 2021 Jan 27;11(1):2350. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-82034-5. Sci Rep. 2021. PMID: 33504947 Free PMC article.
-
Head and Neck Reconstruction in the Vessel Depleted Neck.Front Oral Maxillofac Med. 2020 Aug;2:13. doi: 10.21037/fomm-20-38. Front Oral Maxillofac Med. 2020. PMID: 33236000 Free PMC article.
-
Transverse cervical vessels as recipient vessels in oral and maxillofacial microsurgical reconstruction after former operations with or without radiotherapy.World J Surg Oncol. 2015 May 14;13:183. doi: 10.1186/s12957-015-0576-8. World J Surg Oncol. 2015. PMID: 25966959 Free PMC article.
-
Transverse cervical vessels as a recipient site for microvascular reconstruction in vessel-depleted necks: a safe option.JPRAS Open. 2021 Jun 18;30:6-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jpra.2021.06.003. eCollection 2021 Dec. JPRAS Open. 2021. PMID: 34337128 Free PMC article.
-
Multiple Free Flap Reconstructions of Head and Neck Defects Due to Oral Cancer.Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2017 Jun 13;5(6):e1337. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000001337. eCollection 2017 Jun. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2017. PMID: 28740764 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical