Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Sep;8(5):389-98.
doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2011.07.003. Epub 2012 Jan 30.

Amyloid imaging in dementias with atypical presentation

Affiliations

Amyloid imaging in dementias with atypical presentation

David A Wolk et al. Alzheimers Dement. 2012 Sep.

Abstract

Background: With the potential emergence of disease specific therapies, an accurate biomarker of Alzheimer's Disease pathology is needed in cases in which the underlying etiology is uncertain. We explored the potential value of amyloid imaging in patients with atypical presentations of dementia.

Methods: Twenty-eight patients with atypical dementia underwent positron emission tomography imaging with the amyloid imaging tracer Pittsburgh compound B (PiB). Twenty-six had [18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography scans. After extensive clinical evaluation, this group of patients generated considerable diagnostic uncertainty and received working diagnoses that included possible Alzheimer's disease (AD), focal dementias (e.g., posterior cortical atrophy [PCA]), or cases in which no clear diagnostic category could be determined (dementia of uncertain etiology). Patients were classified as PiB-positive, PiB-negative, or PiB-intermediate, based on objective criteria. Anterior-posterior and left-right indices of PiB and [18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose uptake were calculated to examine differences in distribution of amyloid pathology and metabolic changes associated with clinical phenotype.

Results: Eleven patients (39%) were PiB positive, 16 were PiB negative (57%), and one (4%) was PiB intermediate. By diagnostic category, three of 10 patients (30%) with dementia of uncertain etiology, one of five (20%) with primary progressive aphasia, three of five (60%) with PCA, and four of seven (57%) with possible AD were PiB positive. Brain metabolism of both PiB-positive and PiB-negative patients was generally similar by phenotype, but appeared to differ from typical AD. PCA patients also appeared to differ in their relative distribution of PiB compared with typical AD, consistent with their atypical phenotype.

Conclusions: AD pathology is frequently present in atypical presentations of dementia and can be identified by amyloid imaging. Clinical phenotype is more related to the pattern of cerebral hypometabolism than the presence/absence of amyloid pathology. These findings have diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic implications.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PiB retention in three ROIs measured by standardized uptake value ratio (SUVR) in patients classified as Dementia of Uncertain Etiology (DUE; solid black circles), Primary Progessive Aphasia (PPA; open black squares), Posterior Cortical Atrophy (PCA; solid black diamonds), possible Alzheimer’s Disease (pAD; open black triangles), and typical Alzheimer’s Disease (typical AD; solid blue squares). The red bars represent cutoffs for determining amyloid status in each ROI. ACG: anterior cingulate gyrus; PRC: precuneus; PON: pons
Figure 2
Figure 2
PiB (left) and FDG (right) images for three exemplar cases. Case #21 was classified as DUE, Case #29 was classified as PCA, and Case #8 was classified as PPA. Solid arrows represent areas of relatively high PiB or FDG uptake while open areas represent relatively lower areas. Images are quantified by standardized uptake volume ratio (SUVR) with the respective displayed color scales.

References

    1. Winblad B, Palmer K, Kivipelto M, et al. Mild cognitive impairment--beyond controversies, towards a consensus: report of the International Working Group on Mild Cognitive Impairment. J Intern Med. 2004;256:240–6. - PubMed
    1. Petersen RC. Mild cognitive impairment as a diagnostic entity. Journal of Internal Medicine. 2004;256:183–94. - PubMed
    1. Alladi S, Xuereb J, Bak T, et al. Focal cortical presentations of Alzheimer’s disease. Brain. 2007;130:2636–45. - PubMed
    1. Forman MS, Farmer J, Johnson JK, et al. Frontotemporal dementia: clinicopathological correlations. Ann Neurol. 2006;59:952–62. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mesulam M, Wicklund A, Johnson N, et al. Alzheimer and frontotemporal pathology in subsets of primary progressive aphasia. Ann Neurol. 2008;63:709–19. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types