Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Feb;22(1):111-8.
doi: 10.1007/s11136-012-0120-z.

Missing content from health-related quality of life instruments: interviews with young adult survivors of childhood cancer

Gwendolyn P Quinn  1 , I-Chan Huang, Devin Murphy, Katie Zidonik-Eddelton, Kevin R Krull
Affiliations

Missing content from health-related quality of life instruments: interviews with young adult survivors of childhood cancer

Gwendolyn P Quinn et al. Qual Life Res. 2013 Feb.

Abstract

Purpose: Young adult survivors of childhood cancer (YASCC) are an ever-growing cohort of survivors due to increasing advances in technology. Today, there is a shift of focus to not just ensuring survivorship but also the quality of survivorship, which can be assessed with standardized instruments. The majority of standardized health related quality of life (HRQoL) instruments, however, are non-specific to this age group and the unique late effects within YASCC populations. The purpose of this study was to investigate the relevance and accuracy of standardized HRQoL instruments used with YASCC.

Methods: In a previous study, HRQoL items from several instruments (SF-36, QLACS, QLS-CS) were examined for relevance with a population of YASCC. Participants (n = 30) from this study were recruited for a follow-up qualitative interview to expand on their perceptions of missing content from existing instruments.

Results: Respondents reported missing, relevant content among all three of the HRQoL instruments. Results identified three content areas of missing information: (1) Perceived sense of self, (2) Relationships, and (3) Parenthood.

Conclusions: Existing HRQoL instruments do not take into account the progression and interdependence of emotional development impacted by a cancer diagnosis. The themes derived from our qualitative interviews may serve as a foundation for the generation of new items in future HRQoL instruments for YASCC populations. Further testing is required to examine the prevalence, frequency, and breadth of these items in a larger sample.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Impact of a cancer diagnosis on relationships
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Ries LAG, Melbert D, Krapcho M, et al., editors. SEER cancer statistics review: 1975–2005. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute; 2008.
    1. Bleyer A, Barr R. In: Cancer epidemiology in older adolescents and young adults 15 to 29 years of age, including seer incidence and survival, highlights and challenges. Bleyer A, O’Leary M, Barr R, et al., editors. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute; 2006. pp. 1975–2000. NIH publication 06-5767.
    1. Evan EE, Zeltzer LK. Psychosocial dimensions of cancer in adolescents and young adults. Cancer. 2006;107:1663–1671. - PubMed
    1. Closing the Gap: Research and Care Imperatives for Adolescents and Young Adults with Cancer. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services; NIH publication 06-6067.
    1. Blaauwbroek R, Groenier KH, Kamps WA, Meyboom-de Jong B, et al. Late effects in adult survivors of childhood cancer: The need for life-long follow-up. Annals of Oncology. 2007;18(11):1898–1902. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources