Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Jul;19(6):2419-27.
doi: 10.1007/s11356-012-0754-y.

Evaluation of substrate removal kinetics for UASB reactors treating chlorinated ethanes

Affiliations

Evaluation of substrate removal kinetics for UASB reactors treating chlorinated ethanes

Debolina Basu et al. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2012 Jul.

Abstract

Purpose: Lack of focus on the treatment of wastewaters bearing potentially hazardous pollutants like 1,1,2 trichloroethane and 1,1,2,2 tetrachloroethane in anaerobic reactors has provided an impetus to undertake this study. The objective of this exercise was to quantify the behavior of upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactors and predict their performance based on the overall organic substrate removal.

Methods: The reactors (wastewater-bearing TCA (R2), and wastewater-bearing TeCA (R3)) were operated at different hydraulic retention times (HRTs), i.e., 36, 30, 24, 18, and 12 h corresponding to food-to-mass ratios varying in the range of 0.2–0.7 mg chemical oxygen demand (COD) mg−1 volatile suspended solids day−1. The process kinetics of substrate utilization was evaluated on the basis of experimental results, by applying three mathematical models namely first order, Grau second order, and Michaelis-Menten type kinetics.

Results: The results showed that the lowering of HRT below 24 h resulted in reduced COD removal efficiencies and higher effluent pollutant concentrations in the reactors. The Grau second-order model was successfully applied to obtain the substrate utilization kinetics with high value of R 2 (>0.95). The Grau second-order substrate removal constant (K 2) was calculated as 1.12 and 7.53 day−1 for reactors R2 and R3, respectively.

Conclusion: This study demonstrated the suitability of Grau second-order kinetic model over other models, for predicting the performance of reactors R2 and R3, in treating wastewaters containing chlorinated ethanes under different organic and hydraulic loading conditions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

References

    1. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1988 Dec;54(12):2976-80 - PubMed
    1. J Environ Manage. 2008 Jan;86(1):121-31 - PubMed
    1. Environ Sci Technol. 1994 Apr 1;28(4):746-52 - PubMed
    1. J Contam Hydrol. 2004 May;70(1-2):117-45 - PubMed
    1. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2001 Aug 5;74(3):181-95 - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources