Evaluation of substrate removal kinetics for UASB reactors treating chlorinated ethanes
- PMID: 22286857
- DOI: 10.1007/s11356-012-0754-y
Evaluation of substrate removal kinetics for UASB reactors treating chlorinated ethanes
Abstract
Purpose: Lack of focus on the treatment of wastewaters bearing potentially hazardous pollutants like 1,1,2 trichloroethane and 1,1,2,2 tetrachloroethane in anaerobic reactors has provided an impetus to undertake this study. The objective of this exercise was to quantify the behavior of upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactors and predict their performance based on the overall organic substrate removal.
Methods: The reactors (wastewater-bearing TCA (R2), and wastewater-bearing TeCA (R3)) were operated at different hydraulic retention times (HRTs), i.e., 36, 30, 24, 18, and 12 h corresponding to food-to-mass ratios varying in the range of 0.2–0.7 mg chemical oxygen demand (COD) mg−1 volatile suspended solids day−1. The process kinetics of substrate utilization was evaluated on the basis of experimental results, by applying three mathematical models namely first order, Grau second order, and Michaelis-Menten type kinetics.
Results: The results showed that the lowering of HRT below 24 h resulted in reduced COD removal efficiencies and higher effluent pollutant concentrations in the reactors. The Grau second-order model was successfully applied to obtain the substrate utilization kinetics with high value of R 2 (>0.95). The Grau second-order substrate removal constant (K 2) was calculated as 1.12 and 7.53 day−1 for reactors R2 and R3, respectively.
Conclusion: This study demonstrated the suitability of Grau second-order kinetic model over other models, for predicting the performance of reactors R2 and R3, in treating wastewaters containing chlorinated ethanes under different organic and hydraulic loading conditions.
Similar articles
-
Effect of carbon sources on the removal of 1,1,2-trichloroethane and 1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane in UASB reactor.J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng. 2012;47(4):638-44. doi: 10.1080/10934529.2012.650586. J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng. 2012. PMID: 22375547
-
Upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor--a review.Indian J Environ Health. 2001 Apr;43(2):1-82. Indian J Environ Health. 2001. PMID: 12397675 Review.
-
Kinetic of carbonaceous substrate in an upflow anaerobic sludge sludge blanket (UASB) reactor treating 2,4 dichlorophenol (2,4 DCP).J Environ Manage. 2008 Jan;86(1):121-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.11.030. Epub 2007 Jan 24. J Environ Manage. 2008. PMID: 17254694
-
Biodegradation of 1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane in Upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactor.Bioresour Technol. 2010 Jan;101(1):21-5. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2009.06.074. Epub 2009 Aug 20. Bioresour Technol. 2010. PMID: 19699084
-
Abiotic degradation of chlorinated ethanes and ethenes in water.Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2012 Jul;19(6):1994-2006. doi: 10.1007/s11356-012-0764-9. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2012. PMID: 22293908 Free PMC article. Review.
References
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources