Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2012 Feb;93(2):253-8.
doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2011.09.005.

No specific effect of whole-body vibration training in chronic stroke: a double-blind randomized controlled study

Affiliations
Free article
Randomized Controlled Trial

No specific effect of whole-body vibration training in chronic stroke: a double-blind randomized controlled study

Christina Brogårdh et al. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012 Feb.
Free article

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the effects of whole-body vibration (WBV) training in individuals after stroke.

Design: A double-blind randomized controlled study with assessments pre- and posttraining.

Setting: A university hospital rehabilitation department.

Participants: Participants (N=31; mean age ± SD, 62±7 y; 6-101 mo poststroke) were randomized to an intervention group or a control group.

Interventions: Supervised WBV training (2 sessions/wk for 6wk; 12 repetitions of 40-60s WBV per session). The intervention group trained on a vibrating platform with a conventional amplitude (3.75 mm) and the control group on a "placebo" vibrating platform (0.2mm amplitude); the frequency was 25Hz on both platforms. All participants and examiners were blinded to the amplitudes of the 2 platforms.

Main outcome measures: Primary outcome measures were isokinetic and isometric knee muscle strength (dynamometer). Secondary outcome measures were balance (Berg Balance Scale), muscle tone (Modified Ashworth Scale), gait performance (Timed Up & Go, comfortable gait speed, fast gait speed, and six-minute walk tests), and perceived participation (Stroke Impact Scale).

Results: There were no significant differences between the 2 groups after the WBV training. Significant but small improvements (P<.05) in body function and gait performance were found within both groups, but the magnitude of the changes was in the range of normative variation.

Conclusions: Six weeks of WBV training on a vibration platform with conventional amplitude was not more efficient than a placebo vibrating platform. Therefore, the use of WBV training in individuals with chronic stroke and mild to moderate disability is not supported.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types