Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2012 Feb;4(1):11-4.
doi: 10.1111/j.1757-7861.2011.00164.x.

Are stand-alone cages sufficient for anterior lumbar interbody fusion?

Affiliations
Review

Are stand-alone cages sufficient for anterior lumbar interbody fusion?

Ji-dong Zhang et al. Orthop Surg. 2012 Feb.

Abstract

Anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) has increased in popularity because it has advantages over posterior fusion. Because there is disagreement about the stability of stand-alone cage ALIF, some surgeons use various types of supplementary fixation, including anterior plates, pedicle screw systems and translaminar screws, to increase segmental stability. Many factors associated with both the cages and endplates influence the time of onset and extent of subsidence after use of stand-alone cage ALIF. A large round cage with an adequate central opening is recommended to facilitate maximum contact with the periphery of the endplate. With regard to the relationship between radiographic fusion and recurrence of symptoms with the development of subsidence, most researchers have reported finding no correlation. Subsidence may be due to a process of bone incorporation between cages and endplates. Does subsidence or nonfusion really matter clinically? Further prospective, randomized controlled trials are very much needed to answer these questions.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Capener N. Spondylolisthesis. Br J Surg, 1932, 19: 374–386.
    1. Mercer W. Spondylolisthesis: with a description of a new method of operative treatment and notes of ten cases. Edinburgh Med J, 1936, 43: 545–572. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aebi M, Parthasarathy S, Avadhani A, et al Minimal invasive anterior lumbar interbody fusion (mini ALIF). Eur Spine J, 2010, 19: 335–336. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Min JH, Jang JS, Lee SH. Comparison of anterior‐ and posterior‐approach instrumented lumbar interbody fusion for spondylolisthesis. J Neurosurg Spine, 2007, 7: 21–26. - PubMed
    1. Ohtori S, Koshi T, Yamashita M, et al Single‐level instrumented posterolateral fusion versus non‐instrumented anterior interbody fusion for lumbar spondylolisthesis: a prospective study with a 2‐year follow‐up. J Orthop Sci, 2011, 16: 352–358. - PubMed