Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2011 Dec;118(12):633-9.
doi: 10.5177/ntvt.2011.12.11159.

[Notes concerning an overdenture on 2 implants as the standard for treating an edentulous mandible]

[Article in Dutch]
Affiliations
Review

[Notes concerning an overdenture on 2 implants as the standard for treating an edentulous mandible]

[Article in Dutch]
D Wismeijer et al. Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd. 2011 Dec.

Abstract

Patients with an edentulous mandible often have difficulty retaining conventional dentures. It was formerly the case that, as a rule, 4 implants were placed in the interforaminal area of the mandible in order to provide retention for the mandibular denture. A large body of research, however, revealed good results with 2 implants with various mesostructures. The 2 implant overdenture in the mandible has since become standard for edentulous patients. Research results indicate that this treatment should be the primary option under certain conditions. The appropriate types of care which are indicated by these conditions should, however, be carefully distinguished. Under certain anatomical conditions, such as a low and narrow alveolar ridge, exposed mandibular nerves, very low density alveolar bone (Class IV bone) and very sensitive mucous membranes, 4 implants are indicated. Patients who are less manually dextrous might be better served with 2 implants and a single mesostructure.

PubMed Disclaimer