Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2012 Jul;26(7):1795-802.
doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2149-z. Epub 2012 Feb 1.

Minimally invasive intrathoracic anastomosis after Ivor Lewis esophagectomy for cancer: a review of transoral or transthoracic use of staplers

Affiliations
Review

Minimally invasive intrathoracic anastomosis after Ivor Lewis esophagectomy for cancer: a review of transoral or transthoracic use of staplers

K W Maas et al. Surg Endosc. 2012 Jul.

Abstract

Background: Minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy is one of the approaches used worldwide for treating esophageal cancer. Optimization of this approach and especially identifying the ideal intrathoracic anastomosis technique is needed. To date, different types of anastomosis have been described. A literature search on the current techniques and approaches for intrathoracic anastomosis was held. The studies were evaluated on leakage and stenosis rate of the anastomosis.

Methods: The PubMed electronic database was used for comprehensive literature search by two independent reviewers.

Results: Twelve studies were included in this review. The most frequent applied technique was the stapled anastomosis. Stapled anastomoses can be divided into a transthoracic or a transoral introduction. This stapled approach can be performed with a circular or linear stapler. The reported anastomotic leakage rate ranges from 0 to 10%. The reported anastomotic stenosis rate ranges from 0 to 27.5%.

Conclusions: This review has found no important differences between the two most frequently used stapled anastomoses: the transoral introduction of the anvil and the transthoracic. Clinical trials are needed to compare different methods to improve the quality of the intrathoracic anastomosis after esophagectomy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Overview of minimally invasive anastomosis techniques
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Handsewn intrathoracic anastomosis (in line illustrations by M.A. Cuesta)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Fixation of the anvil by a Roeder’s Knot (in line illustrations by M.A. Cuesta)
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Fixation of the anvil by purse-string using the Endostitch (in line illustrations by M.A. Cuesta)
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Transoral introduction of anvil by gastric tube (in line illustrations by M.A. Cuesta)
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Side-to-side stapled intrathoracic anastomosis (in line illustrations by M.A. Cuesta)

References

    1. Kent MS, Schuchert M, Fernando H, Luketich JD. Minimally invasive esophagectomy: state of the art. Dis Esophagus. 2006;19:137–145. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2006.00555.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lewis I. The surgical treatment of carcinoma of the oesophagus: with special reference to a new operation for growths of the middle third. Br J Surg. 1946;34:18–31. doi: 10.1002/bjs.18003413304. - DOI - PubMed
    1. McKeown KC. Total three-stage oesophagectomy for cancer of the oesophagus. Br J Surg. 1976;63:259–262. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800630403. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Orringer MB, Sloan H. Esophagectomy without thoracotomy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1978;76:643–654. - PubMed
    1. Scheepers JJ, van der Peet DL, Veenhof AA, Heijnen B, Cuesta MA. Systematic approach of postoperative gastric conduit complications after esophageal resection. Dis Esophagus. 2009;23:117–121. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2009.00970.x. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms