Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Feb 28;106(5):970-4.
doi: 10.1038/bjc.2012.22. Epub 2012 Jan 31.

Skin cancer screening participation and impact on melanoma incidence in Germany--an observational study on incidence trends in regions with and without population-based screening

A Waldmann  1 , S Nolte, M A Weinstock, E W Breitbart, N Eisemann, A C Geller, R Greinert, B Volkmer, A Katalinic
Affiliations

Skin cancer screening participation and impact on melanoma incidence in Germany--an observational study on incidence trends in regions with and without population-based screening

A Waldmann et al. Br J Cancer. .

Abstract

Background: The SCREEN (Skin Cancer Research to provide Evidence for Effectiveness of Screening in Northern Germany) project involved population-wide skin cancer screening with whole-body examination by general physicians and dermatologists. It was conducted in the German state of Schleswig-Holstein (July 2003-June 2004), but not in the German state of Saarland.

Methods: The population-based registries of Schleswig-Holstein and Saarland provided data on melanoma incidence before, during, and after SCREEN to assess the association of skin cancer screening with incidence.

Results: Approximately 19% of the Schleswig-Holstein population participated in SCREEN (women: 27%, men: 10%). A total of 52% of all melanomas diagnosed during SCREEN in Schleswig-Holstein were detected as part of the project. Melanoma incidence increased during SCREEN (invasive melanoma in women: +8.9 per 100,000 (95% confidence intervals (CI): 6.1; 11.7); men: +4.0 per 100,000 (95% CI: 1.6; 6.4)) and decreased afterwards (women: -10.6 per 100,000 (95% CI: -13.3; -7.9); men: -4.1 per 100,000 (95% CI: -6.5; -1.7)). Similar changes were not observed in Saarland that had no such project. The differences between the two states were greatest among women, the group with the greater SCREEN participation.

Conclusion: The SCREEN project had a substantial impact on melanoma incidence. This is consistent with the impact of effective screening for other cancers.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

    1. Altenhofen L, Heringer M, Blaschy S, Fischer M, Pilgermann I, Lichtner F, Fleck J, Folle J, Gensler S (2009) Projekt wissenschaftliche Begleitung von Früherkennungs-Koloskopien in Deutschland. Berichtszeitraum 2007 – 5. Jahresbericht. Version 1.1. Zentralinstitut für die kassenärztliche Versorgung in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland: Berlin
    1. Anttila A, Sarkeala T, Hakulinen T, Heinavaara S (2008) Impacts of the Finnish service screening programme on breast cancer rates. BMC Public Health 8: 38. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Breitbart EW, Waldmann A, Nolte S, Capellaro M, Greinert R, Volkmer B, Katalinic A (2011) Systematic skin cancer screening in Northern Germany. J Am Acad Dermatol 66(2): 201–211 - PubMed
    1. Canfell K, Sitas F, Beral V (2006) Cervical cancer in Australia and the United Kingdom: comparison of screening policy and uptake, and cancer incidence and mortality. Med J Aust 185(9): 482–486 - PubMed
    1. Dobson AJ, Kuulasmaa K, Eberle E, Scherer J (1991) Confidence intervals for weighted sums of Poisson parameters. Statist Med 10: 457–462 - PubMed