Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Feb;7(1):2-8.
doi: 10.2174/157340311795677662.

Risk scores for patients with chest pain: evaluation in the emergency department

B E Backus  1 , A J Six, J H Kelder, W B Gibler, F L Moll, P A Doevendans
Affiliations

Risk scores for patients with chest pain: evaluation in the emergency department

B E Backus et al. Curr Cardiol Rev. 2011 Feb.

Abstract

Chest pain is a common reason for presentation to the emergency department (ED). Absolute criteria for Acute Coronary Syndrome without ST elevation (NSTE-ACS) are lacking. An acute coronary syndrome (ACS) needs to be distinguished from a variety of other cardiac and non-cardiac diseases that may cause chest pain.For patients with confirmed ACS, several scoring methods can be applied in order to distinguish patients in the coronary care unit who may benefit most from therapies. The PURSUIT, TIMI, GRACE and FRISC risk scores are well validated with this respect. However, none of these risk scores has been used in the identification of an ACS in the emergency setting. The vast majority of patients with chest pain due to causes other than ACS were not evaluated in these trials. An evidence-based systematic stratification and policy for these patients does not currently exist.The more recently developed HEART score is specifically designed to stratify all chest pain patients in the ED. The HEART score was validated in a retrospective multicenter study and proved to be a strong predictor of event free survival on one hand and potentially life threatening cardiac events on the other hand. The HEART score facilitates risk stratification of chest pain patients in the ED.

Keywords: Chest pain; emergency department.; risk scores.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. (1)
Fig. (1)
Probability of reaching a MACE in each HEART category [14].
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Lee TH, Goldman L. Evaluation of the patient with acute chest pain. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:1187–95. - PubMed
    1. Bassand JP, Christian WH, Ardissino D, et al. ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J. 2007;28:1598–660. - PubMed
    1. Swap CJ, Nagurney JT. Value and limitations of chest pain history in the evaluation of patients with suspected acute coronary syndromes. JAMA. 2005;294:2623–29. - PubMed
    1. Boersma E, Pieper KS, Steyerberg EW, et al. for the PURSUIT investigators. Predictors of outcome in patients with acute coronary syndromes without persistent ST-segment elevation. Results from an international trial of 9461 patients. Circulation. 2000;101:2557–67. - PubMed
    1. Antman EM, Cohen Mk, Bernink PJLM, et al. The TIMI risk score for unstable angina/ non-ST elevation MI. JAMA. 2000;284:835–42. - PubMed