Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011:2011:831605.
doi: 10.4061/2011/831605. Epub 2011 Jul 17.

Cancer multidisciplinary team meetings: evidence, challenges, and the role of clinical decision support technology

Affiliations

Cancer multidisciplinary team meetings: evidence, challenges, and the role of clinical decision support technology

Vivek Patkar et al. Int J Breast Cancer. 2011.

Abstract

Multidisciplinary team (MDT) model in cancer care was introduced and endorsed to ensure that care delivery is consistent with the best available evidence. Over the last few years, regular MDT meetings have become a standard practice in oncology and gained the status of the key decision-making forum for patient management. Despite the fact that cancer MDT meetings are well accepted by clinicians, concerns are raised over the paucity of good-quality evidence on their overall impact. There are also concerns over lack of the appropriate support for this important but overburdened decision-making platform. The growing acceptance by clinical community of the health information technology in recent years has created new opportunities and possibilities of using advanced clinical decision support (CDS) systems to realise full potential of cancer MDT meetings. In this paper, we present targeted summary of the available evidence on the impact of cancer MDT meetings, discuss the reported challenges, and explore the role that a CDS technology could play in addressing some of these challenges.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Composite screenshot describing some of the functionalities of an example CDS tool developed for breast cancer MDT meeting. Upper left: the summary screen for the patient. Upper right: one of the many prognostication tools available, Lower left: decision panel where system recommendations and eligible clinical trials are highlighted in blue. Lower right: the evidential justification for each recommended option.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Fennell ML, Das IP, Clauser S, Petrelli N, Salner A. The organization of multidisciplinary care teams: modeling internal and external influences on cancer care quality. Journal of the National Cancer Institute Monographs. 2010;(40):72–80. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Berman HL. The tumor board: is it worth saving? Military Medicine. 1975;140(8):529–531. - PubMed
    1. Gross GE. The role of the tumor board in a community hospital. Ca: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians. 1987;37(2):88–92. - PubMed
    1. Calman-Hine Report. Expert Advisory Group on Cancer. A policy framework for commissioning cancer services: a report to the chief medical officers of England and Wales. Department of Health, 1995.
    1. van Leeuwen AF, Voogt E, Visser A, van der Rijt CCD, van der Heide A. Considerations of healthcare professionals in medical decision-making about treatment for clinical end-stage cancer patients. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management. 2004;28(4):351–355. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources