[Necrotizing entercolitis and intestinal perforation in very low weight premature infants: which is the best surgical option?]
- PMID: 22295654
[Necrotizing entercolitis and intestinal perforation in very low weight premature infants: which is the best surgical option?]
Abstract
Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) and isolated intestinal perforation (IP) are common diseases in very low birth weight infants (VLBW) and require surgery in 20-40% of cases. We have performed a retrospective review of VLBW infants with NEC or IP who underwent a surgical procedure between 2000 and 2010, either initial laparotomy (group 1), peritoneal drain placement and subsequent laparotomy (group 2) or peritoneal drainage (group 3). Of 487 VLBW infants admitted to our hospital in the last ten years, 80 patients had NEC or IP, out of these, 31% (n=25) were treated surgically. The study population consisted of 14 girls and 11 boys with a mean gestational age of 26+3 weeks and mean birth weight of 801.4 g (range 460 to 1490 g). Pneumoperitoneum was seen in 48% of cases (n=12). Twelve patients underwent initial laparotomy, 10 patients were treated with peritoneal drainage and subsequent laparotomy and in 3 patients a peritoneal drainage was placed. Mean time between drainage and laparotomy was 69.6 hours. Sixty-eight percent of patients had NEC and thirty-two percent were IP. Survival rate was higher in the group who underwent initial laparotomy (p = 0.001) with an overall mortality of 32% (8 deaths). Optimal surgical procedure must be decided upon clinical condition of individual patients. We consider that initial laparotomy should be the treatment option in VLBW infants with intestinal perforation due to NEC or IP.
Similar articles
-
Laparotomy versus peritoneal drainage for necrotizing enterocolitis or isolated intestinal perforation in extremely low birth weight infants: outcomes through 18 months adjusted age.Pediatrics. 2006 Apr;117(4):e680-7. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-1273. Epub 2006 Mar 20. Pediatrics. 2006. PMID: 16549503
-
Laparotomy versus peritoneal drainage for necrotizing enterocolitis and perforation.N Engl J Med. 2006 May 25;354(21):2225-34. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa054605. N Engl J Med. 2006. PMID: 16723614 Clinical Trial.
-
Outcome of perforated necrotizing enterocolitis in the very low-birth weight neonate may be independent of the type of surgical treatment.Am Surg. 2001 Aug;67(8):752-6. Am Surg. 2001. PMID: 11510576
-
Surgical management of extremely low birth weight infants with neonatal bowel perforation: a single-center experience and a review of the literature.Neonatology. 2012;101(4):285-92. doi: 10.1159/000335325. Epub 2012 Jan 27. Neonatology. 2012. PMID: 22286302 Review.
-
Evidence vs experience in the surgical management of necrotizing enterocolitis and focal intestinal perforation.J Perinatol. 2008 May;28 Suppl 1:S14-7. doi: 10.1038/jp.2008.44. J Perinatol. 2008. PMID: 18446170 Review.
Cited by
-
Postoperative outcome in premature infants with open abdomen.Hernia. 2014 Jun;18(3):351-6. doi: 10.1007/s10029-014-1226-8. Epub 2014 Feb 8. Hernia. 2014. PMID: 24509864
-
Laparotomy versus Peritoneal Drainage as Primary Treatment for Surgical Necrotizing Enterocolitis or Spontaneous Intestinal Perforation in Preterm Neonates: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Children (Basel). 2023 Jul 6;10(7):1170. doi: 10.3390/children10071170. Children (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37508667 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Medical