Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 May;14(5):543-7.
doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivr075. Epub 2012 Jan 31.

Very low survival rates after non-traumatic lower limb amputation in a consecutive series: what to do?

Affiliations

Very low survival rates after non-traumatic lower limb amputation in a consecutive series: what to do?

Morten Tange Kristensen et al. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2012 May.

Abstract

The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate factors potentially influencing short- and long-term mortality in patients who had a non-traumatic lower limb amputation in a university hospital. A consecutive series of 93 amputations (16% toe/foot, 33% trans-tibial, 9% through knee and 42% trans-femoral) were studied. Their mean age was 75.8 years; 21 (23%) were admitted from a nursing home and 87 (92%) were amputated due to a vascular disease and/or diabetes. Thirty days and 1-year mortality were 30 and 54%, respectively. Cox regression analysis demonstrated that the 30-day mortality was associated with older age (P = 0.01), and the number of co-morbidities (P = 0.04), when adjusted for gender, previous amputations, cause of and amputation level, and residential status. Thus, a patient with 4 or 5 co-morbidities (n = 20) was seven times more likely to die within 30 days, compared with a patient with 1 co-morbidity (n = 16). Further, the risk of not surviving increased with 7% per each additional year the patient got older. Of concern, almost one-third of patients died within 1 month. This may be unavoidable, but a multidisciplinary, optimized, multimodal pre- and postoperative programme should be instituted, trying to improve the outcome.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:
Age groups and survival from the date of amputation.
Figure 2:
Figure 2:
Co-morbidities and survival from the date of amputation.

Comment in

References

    1. Aulivola B, Hile CN, Hamdan AD, Sheahan MG, Veraldi JR, Skillman JJ, et al. Major lower extremity amputation: outcome of a modern series. Arch Surg. 2004;139:395–9. - PubMed
    1. Basu NN, Fassiadis N, McIrvine A. Mobility one year after unilateral lower limb amputation: a modern, UK institutional report. Interact CardioVasc Thorac Surg. 2008;7:1024–6. - PubMed
    1. Feinglass J, Pearce WH, Martin GJ, Gibbs J, Cowper D, Sorensen M, et al. Postoperative and late survival outcomes after major amputation: findings from the Department of Veterans Affairs National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Surgery. 2001;130:21–9. - PubMed
    1. Johannesson A, Larsson GU, Oberg T. From major amputation to prosthetic outcome: a prospective study of 190 patients in a defined population. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2004;28:9–21. - PubMed
    1. Lim TS, Finlayson A, Thorpe JM, Sieunarine K, Mwipatayi BP, Brady A, et al. Outcomes of a contemporary amputation series. ANZ J Surg. 2006;76:300–5. - PubMed

MeSH terms