Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2012 Apr;19(4):522-6.
doi: 10.1128/CVI.05573-11. Epub 2012 Feb 1.

Antituberculosis IgG antibodies as a marker of active Mycobacterium tuberculosis disease

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Antituberculosis IgG antibodies as a marker of active Mycobacterium tuberculosis disease

Ryan J Welch et al. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2012 Apr.

Abstract

Anti-Mycobacterium tuberculosis IgG antibodies may aid in the diagnosis of active M. tuberculosis disease. We studied whether anti-M. tuberculosis IgG antibodies are elevated in active M. tuberculosis disease and assessed factors contributing to false-positive and -negative results. A retrospective study of 2,150 individuals tested by the QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube (QFT-GIT) assay was conducted at the University of Utah, ARUP Laboratories, November 2008 to December 2010. All samples were tested with the InBios Active TbDetect antituberculosis (anti-TB) IgG antibody assay. Of 1,044 patients with a positive QFT-GIT, 59 (5.7%) were positive for M. tuberculosis antibodies. Fourteen of 1,106 (1.3%) with a negative or indeterminate QFT-GIT were positive for M. tuberculosis antibodies. M. tuberculosis antibody tests were positive in 61.5% with confirmed active M. tuberculosis disease and other mycobacterial infections. Over half of the false-negative M. tuberculosis antibody tests occurred in patients ≥ 90 years of age. False positives were seen in 12.9% of autoimmune patients. The odds ratio of being positive by the QFT-GIT and the InBios TB IgG assay increased with confirmed M. tuberculosis disease or highly suspected M. tuberculosis disease and was 86.7 (95% confidence interval [CI], 34.4 to 218.5) in these two groups compared to patients negative by both tests. Although anti-M. tuberculosis antibodies can be detected in patients with active M. tuberculosis disease, caution should be used with patients where immunoglobulin levels may be decreased or patients with autoantibodies.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Abebe F, Bjune G. 2009. The protective role of antibody responses during Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 157: 235–243 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Anderson BL, Welch RJ, Litwin CM. 2008. Assessment of three commercially available serologic assays for detection of antibodies to Mycobacterium tuberculosis and identification of active tuberculosis. Clin. Vaccine Immunol. 15: 1644–1649 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Azzurri A, et al. 2006. Serological markers of pulmonary tuberculosis and of response to anti-tuberculosis treatment in a patient population in Guinea. Int. J. Immunopathol. Pharmacol. 19: 199–208 - PubMed
    1. Demkow U, et al. 2007. Heterogeneity of antibody response to myobacterial antigens in different clinical manifestations of pulmonary tuberculosis. J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 58(Suppl. 5): 117–127 - PubMed
    1. Duchini A, Goss JA, Karpen S, Pockros PJ. 2003. Vaccinations for adult solid-organ transplant recipients: current recommendations and protocols. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 16: 357–364 - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms