Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2012 Jan;7(1):79-85.
doi: 10.4161/psb.7.1.18418.

The modulating effect of bacterial volatiles on plant growth: current knowledge and future challenges

Affiliations
Review

The modulating effect of bacterial volatiles on plant growth: current knowledge and future challenges

Aurélien Bailly et al. Plant Signal Behav. 2012 Jan.

Abstract

Bacteria interact with plants in many different ways. In recent years, bacterial production of volatiles has emerged as a novel process by which bacteria modulate plant growth. Exposure to the volatiles produced by certain bacterial strains has been shown to lead to up to 5-fold increased plant biomass or to plant death. Despite these drastic growth alterations, the elucidation of the molecules responsible, of the mechanism of perception by the plant and of the specific metabolic changes induced in planta is still in its infancy. This review summarizes the current knowledge and highlights future lines of research that should increase our knowledge of the volatile-mediated dialogue between bacteria and plants.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

None
Figure 1. Bacterial volatile organic compounds modulate plant growth. In heterogeneous soils, microorganisms may produce effective concentrations of compounds with inhibiting (left) or improving (right) effects on plant productivity. The observed effects range from plant death to enhanced rooting and greater biomass. Few bioactive molecules have been identified from the complex blends of bacterial VOCs. The involvement of different physiological pathways (oval shapes; double arrows: crosstalk) has been suggested but needs further investigation. Question marks stress the lack of information on VOCs’ target tissues.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ryu CM, Farag MA, Hu CH, Reddy MS, Wei HX, Pare PW, et al. Bacterial volatiles promote growth in Arabidopsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003;100:4927–32. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0730845100. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kai M, Haustein M, Molina F, Petri A, Scholz B, Piechulla B. Bacterial volatiles and their action potential. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2009;81:1001–12. doi: 10.1007/s00253-008-1760-3. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kai M, Piechulla B. Impact of volatiles of the rhizobacteria Serratia odorifera on the moss Physcomitrella patens. Plant Signal Behav. 2010;5:444–6. doi: 10.4161/psb.5.4.11340. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kai M, Vespermann A, Piechulla B. The growth of fungi and Arabidopsis thaliana is influenced by bacterial volatiles. Plant Signal Behav. 2008;3:482–4. doi: 10.4161/psb.3.7.5681. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Vespermann A, Kai M, Piechulla B. Rhizobacterial volatiles affect the growth of fungi and Arabidopsis thaliana. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007;73:5639–41. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01078-07. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Substances

LinkOut - more resources