Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Aug;21(8):1499-507.
doi: 10.1007/s00586-012-2176-4.

Normal morphology, age-related changes and abnormal findings of the cervical spine. Part II: Magnetic resonance imaging of over 1,200 asymptomatic subjects

Fumihiko Kato  1 , Yasutsugu Yukawa, Kota Suda, Masatsune Yamagata, Takayoshi Ueta
Affiliations

Normal morphology, age-related changes and abnormal findings of the cervical spine. Part II: Magnetic resonance imaging of over 1,200 asymptomatic subjects

Fumihiko Kato et al. Eur Spine J. 2012 Aug.

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study is to establish standard MRI values for the cervical spinal canal, dural tube, and spinal cord, to evaluate age-related changes in healthy subjects, and to assess the prevalence of abnormal findings in asymptomatic subjects.

Methods: The sagittal diameter of the spinal canal and the sagittal diameter and cross-sectional area of the dural tube and spinal cord were measured on MRIs of 1,211 healthy volunteers. These included at least 100 men and 100 women in each decade of life between the third (20s) and eighth (70s). Abnormal findings such as spinal cord compression and signal changes in the spinal cord were recorded.

Results: The sagittal diameter of the spinal canal was 11.2 ± 1.4 mm [mean ± standard deviation (SD)]/11.1 ± 1.4 mm (male/female) at the mid-C5 vertebral level, and 9.5 ± 1.8/9.6 ± 1.6 mm at the C5/6 disc level. The cross-sectional area of the spinal cord was 78.1 ± 9.4/74.4 ± 9.4 mm² at the mid-C5 level and 70.6 ± 11.7/68.9 ± 11.3 mm² at the C5/6 disc level. Both the sagittal diameter and the axial area of the dural tube and spinal cord tended to decrease with increasing age. This tendency was more marked at the level of the intervertebral discs than at the level of the vertebral bodies, especially at the C5/6 intervertebral disc level. The spinal cord occupation rate in the dural tube at the C5 vertebral body level averaged 58.3 ± 7.0%. Spinal cord compression was observed in 64 cases (5.3%) and a T2 high-signal change was observed in 28 cases (2.3%).

Conclusions: Using MRI data of 1,211 asymptomatic subjects, the standard values for the cervical spinal canal, dural tube, and spinal cord for healthy members of each sex and each decade of life and the age-related changes in these parameters were established. The relatively high prevalence of abnormal MRI findings of the cervical spine in asymptomatic individuals emphasizes the dangers of predicating operative decisions on diagnostic tests without precisely correlating these findings with clinical signs and symptoms.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Dural tube diameter at the C5/6 in each sex and decade
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Dural tube diameter at the C5 in each sex and decade
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Spinal cord diameter at the C5/6 in each sex and decade
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Spinal cord diameter at the C5 in each sex and decade
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Cross-sectional area of spinal cord at the C5/6 in each sex and decade
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Cross-sectional area of spinal cord at the C5 in each sex and decade
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Higo M, Sako T, Suzuki Y, et al. Roentgenological study of the antero-posterior diameter in cervical developmental canal stenosis. Rinsho Seikei Geka. 1984;19(4):361–366.
    1. Ishikawa M, Matsumoto M, Fujimura Y, et al. Changes of cervical spinal cord and cervical spinal canal with age in asymptomatic subjects. Spinal Cord. 2003;41(3):159–163. doi: 10.1038/sj.sc.3101375. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kameyama T, Hashizume Y, Ando T, et al. Morphometry of the normal cadaveric cervical spinal cord. Spine. 1994;19(18):2077–2081. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199409150-00013. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kimura I, Shingu H, Nasu Y, et al. Computed tomography of the spinal canal for the cervical spine and spinal cord injury. Rinsho Seikei Geka. 1983;18(5):541–551.
    1. Machino M, Yukawa Y, Ito K, et al. Can magnetic resonance imaging reflect the prognosis in patients of cervical spinal cord injury without radiographic abnormality? Spine. 2011;36(24):E1568–E1572. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31821273c0. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types