Foraging speed in staging flocks of semipalmated sandpipers: evidence for scramble competition
- PMID: 22302514
- DOI: 10.1007/s00442-012-2269-0
Foraging speed in staging flocks of semipalmated sandpipers: evidence for scramble competition
Abstract
Foraging speed is a key determinant of fitness affecting both foraging success and predator attack survival. In a scramble for food, for instance, evolutionary stable strategy models predict that speed should increase with competitor density and decrease when the risk of attack by predators increases. Foraging speed should also decrease in richer food patches where the level of competition is reduced. I tested these predictions in fall staging flocks of semipalmated sandpipers (Calidris pusilla) foraging for an evasive prey. Capture rate of these prey decreased with sandpiper density as the presence of competitors reduced the availability of resources for those behind. Foraging speed was evaluated indirectly by measuring the time needed to cross fixed boundaries on mudflats over 6 years. As predicted, foraging speed increased with sandpiper density and decreased with food density, but, unexpectedly, increased closer to obstructive cover where predation risk was deemed higher. When foraging closer to cover, from where predators launch surprise attacks, the increase in foraging speed may compensate for an increase in false alarms that interrupted foraging. While foraging in denser flocks decreases foraging success, joining such flocks may also increase safety against predators. In semipalmated sandpipers that occupy an intermediate position in the food chain, foraging behavior is influenced simultaneously by the evasive responses of their prey and by the risk of attack from their own predators.
Similar articles
-
Competition in foraging flocks of migrating semipalmated sandpipers.Oecologia. 2007 Nov;154(2):403-9. doi: 10.1007/s00442-007-0818-8. Epub 2007 Aug 4. Oecologia. 2007. PMID: 17676344
-
Functional response of staging semipalmated sandpipers feeding on burrowing amphipods.Oecologia. 2009 Sep;161(3):651-5. doi: 10.1007/s00442-009-1398-6. Epub 2009 Jun 20. Oecologia. 2009. PMID: 19543917
-
Foraging success in a wild species of bird varies depending on which eye is used for anti-predator vigilance.Laterality. 2013;18(2):194-202. doi: 10.1080/1357650X.2011.648194. Epub 2012 Mar 8. Laterality. 2013. PMID: 22397500
-
Differential fitness returns in relation to spatial position in groups.Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 1994 May;69(2):187-206. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-185x.1994.tb01505.x. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 1994. PMID: 8054444 Review.
-
Do predators influence the behaviour of bats?Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2013 Aug;88(3):626-44. doi: 10.1111/brv.12021. Epub 2013 Jan 24. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2013. PMID: 23347323 Review.
Cited by
-
Co-migration fidelity at a stopover site increases over time in African-European migratory landbirds.R Soc Open Sci. 2023 Aug 30;10(8):221043. doi: 10.1098/rsos.221043. eCollection 2023 Aug. R Soc Open Sci. 2023. PMID: 37650061 Free PMC article.
-
Gregariousness, foraging effort, and affiliative interactions in lactating bonobos and chimpanzees.Behav Ecol. 2020 Dec 23;32(1):188-198. doi: 10.1093/beheco/araa130. eCollection 2021 Jan-Feb. Behav Ecol. 2020. PMID: 33716569 Free PMC article.
-
The Influence of Food Density, Flock Size, and Disturbance on the Functional Response of Bewick's Swans (Cygnus columbianus bewickii) in Wintering Habitats.Animals (Basel). 2019 Nov 10;9(11):946. doi: 10.3390/ani9110946. Animals (Basel). 2019. PMID: 31717685 Free PMC article.
References
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials