Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Sep 9:2:50.
doi: 10.3389/fgene.2011.00050. eCollection 2011.

Clusters of adaptive evolution in the human genome

Affiliations

Clusters of adaptive evolution in the human genome

Laura B Scheinfeldt et al. Front Genet. .

Abstract

Considerable work has been devoted to identifying regions of the human genome that have been subjected to recent positive selection. Although detailed follow-up studies of putatively selected regions are critical for a deeper understanding of human evolutionary history, such studies have received comparably less attention. Recently, we have shown that ALMS1 has been the target of recent positive selection acting on standing variation in Eurasian populations. Here, we describe a careful follow-up analysis of genetic variation across the ALMS1 region, which unexpectedly revealed a cluster of substrates of positive selection. Specifically, through the analysis of SNP data from the HapMap and Human Genome Diversity Project-Centre d'Etude du Polymorphisme Humain samples as well sequence data from the region, we find compelling evidence for three independent and distinct signals of recent positive selection across this 3 Mb region surrounding ALMS1. Moreover, we analyzed the HapMap data to identify other putative clusters of independent selective events and conservatively discovered 19 additional clusters of adaptive evolution. This work has important implications for the interpretation of genome-scans for positive selection in humans and more broadly contributes to a better understanding of how recent positive selection has shaped genetic variation across the human genome.

Keywords: clustered adaptive events.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Patterns of population specific FST and heterozygosity at chromosome 2 (p13.3–p13.1). The location of each gene (going from left to right: SEC15L2, ALMS, GCS1) is marked by a gray rectangle and black arrow, and additional genes located in the region are shown as white rectangles. Previously inferred recombination hotspots are denoted by black rectangles. For each HapMap sample, population specific FST and heterozygosity are plotted individually in orange and blue respectively.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Distribution of SEC15L2 alleles in 52 populations. Haplogroup frequencies are indicated with pie charts. The ancestral allele is shown in white, and the derived allele is shown in black.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Distribution of ALMS1 alleles in 52 populations. Haplogroup frequencies are indicated with pie charts. The ancestral allele is shown in white, and the derived allele is shown in black.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Distribution of GCS1 alleles in 52 populations. Haplogroup frequencies are indicated with pie charts. The ancestral allele is shown in white, and the derived allele is shown in black.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Phylogenetic relationships among seven continental groups. Maximum likelihood trees for each of the three genes are shown rooted with chimpanzee as the outgroup. The length of the scale bar corresponds to 1% of sites differing between haplotypes.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Patterns of population specific FST at chromosome 2 (q12.3–q13). The location of EDAR is marked by a gray rectangle and black arrow, and additional genes located in the region are shown as white rectangles. Previously inferred recombination hotspots are denoted by black rectangles. For each HapMap sample, population specific FST is plotted individually in blue, and the dashed line in each panel indicates the 99th percentile for each population specific FST. Gray shading indicates 100 kb windows with significantly elevated average values of population specific FST (note, the apparent width of some shaded regions vary because adjacent windows are significant).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Akey J. M. (2009). Constructing genomic maps of positive selection in humans: where do we go from here? Genome Res. 19, 711–72210.1101/gr.086652.108 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bhangale T. R., Stephens M., Nickerson D. A. (2006). Automating resequencing-based detection of insertion-deletion polymorphisms. Nat. Genet. 38, 1457–146210.1038/ng1925 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Carlson C. S., Thomas D. J., Eberle M. A., Swanson J. E., Livingston R. J., Rieder M. J., Nickerson D. A. (2005). Genomic regions exhibiting positive selection identified from dense genotype data. Genome Res. 15, 1553–156510.1101/gr.4326505 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Enard W., Przeworski M., Fisher S. E., Lai C. S., Wiebe V., Kitano T., Monaco A. P., Paabo S. (2002). Molecular evolution of FOXP2, a gene involved in speech and language. Nature 418, 869–87210.1038/nature01025 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ewing B., Green P. (1998). Base-calling of automated sequencer traces using phred. II. Error probabilities. Genome Res. 8, 186–194 - PubMed