Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Jan 16:3:1.
doi: 10.3389/fgene.2012.00001. eCollection 2012.

Moving toward System Genetics through Multiple Trait Analysis in Genome-Wide Association Studies

Affiliations

Moving toward System Genetics through Multiple Trait Analysis in Genome-Wide Association Studies

Daniel Shriner. Front Genet. .

Abstract

Association studies are a staple of genotype-phenotype mapping studies, whether they are based on single markers, haplotypes, candidate genes, genome-wide genotypes, or whole genome sequences. Although genetic epidemiological studies typically contain data collected on multiple traits which themselves are often correlated, most analyses have been performed on single traits. Here, I review several methods that have been developed to perform multiple trait analysis. These methods range from traditional multivariate models for systems of equations to recently developed graphical approaches based on network theory. The application of network theory to genetics is termed systems genetics and has the potential to address long-standing questions in genetics about complex processes such as coordinate regulation, homeostasis, and pleiotropy.

Keywords: multivariate analysis; pleiotropy; systems genetics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(A) A Bayesian network consisting of a marker M, traits D directly associated with M, traits I indirectly associated with M, and traits U unassociated with M. Edges represent conditional dependencies, with the arrow pointing from the parent node to the child node. (B) The adjacency matrix corresponding to the graph in (A). (C) A dynamic Bayesian network for a cycle using an underlying Bayesian network that is acyclic.

References

    1. Almasy L., Dyer T. D., Blangero J. (1997). Bivariate quantitative trait linkage analysis: pleiotropy versus co-incident linkages. Genet. Epidemiol. 14, 953–95810.1002/(SICI)1098-2272(1997)14:6<953::AID-GEPI65>3.0.CO;2-K - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ayroles J. F., Carbone M. A., Stone E. A., Jordan K. W., Lyman R. F., Magwire M. M., Rollmann S. M., Duncan L. H., Lawrence F., Anholt R. R. H., Mackay T. F. C. (2009). Systems genetics of complex traits in Drosophila melanogaster. Nat. Genet. 41, 299–30710.1038/ng.332 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Banerjee S., Yandell B. S., Yi N. (2008). Bayesian quantitative trait loci mapping for multiple traits. Genetics 179, 2275–228910.1534/genetics.108.088427 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Butte A. J., Kohane I. S. (1999). Unsupervised knowledge discovery in medical databases using relevance networks. Proc. AMIA Symp. 711–715 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Butte A. J., Kohane I. S. (2000). Mutual information relevance networks: functional genomic clustering using pairwise entropy measurements. Pac. Symp. Biocomput. 5, 415–426 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources