Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Jan 31;109(5):1691-6.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1120238109. Epub 2012 Jan 17.

In-feed antibiotic effects on the swine intestinal microbiome

Affiliations

In-feed antibiotic effects on the swine intestinal microbiome

Torey Looft et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. .

Abstract

Antibiotics have been administered to agricultural animals for disease treatment, disease prevention, and growth promotion for over 50 y. The impact of such antibiotic use on the treatment of human diseases is hotly debated. We raised pigs in a highly controlled environment, with one portion of the littermates receiving a diet containing performance-enhancing antibiotics [chlortetracycline, sulfamethazine, and penicillin (known as ASP250)] and the other portion receiving the same diet but without the antibiotics. We used phylogenetic, metagenomic, and quantitative PCR-based approaches to address the impact of antibiotics on the swine gut microbiota. Bacterial phylotypes shifted after 14 d of antibiotic treatment, with the medicated pigs showing an increase in Proteobacteria (1-11%) compared with nonmedicated pigs at the same time point. This shift was driven by an increase in Escherichia coli populations. Analysis of the metagenomes showed that microbial functional genes relating to energy production and conversion were increased in the antibiotic-fed pigs. The results also indicate that antibiotic resistance genes increased in abundance and diversity in the medicated swine microbiome despite a high background of resistance genes in nonmedicated swine. Some enriched genes, such as aminoglycoside O-phosphotransferases, confer resistance to antibiotics that were not administered in this study, demonstrating the potential for indirect selection of resistance to classes of antibiotics not fed. The collateral effects of feeding subtherapeutic doses of antibiotics to agricultural animals are apparent and must be considered in cost-benefit analyses.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Shifts in fecal bacterial community membership with antibiotic treatment. (A) NMDS analysis of Bray-Curtis similarity coefficients calculated from 16S rRNA gene sequence data from individual animals at days 0 and 14 shows the similarity among replicate pig fecal samples. (B) Phylum-level composition of fecal microbial communities. Data were pooled for a given treatment and time point and are shown as percentage of abundance. (C) Genus-level composition of Proteobacteria, shown as the total number of sequences (normalized to 50,000 total reads). (D) Predicted genera of COG3188 homologs found in the swine metagenomes based on BLASTx analysis. COG3188 was overrepresented in the medicated metagenome vs. the nonmedicated metagenomes.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Changes in diversity and abundance of antibiotic resistance genes (ARG) in swine feces with antibiotic treatment. (A) Metagenomes were analyzed by BLASTx against the ARDB, and the number of reads were normalized to 100,000 total reads per metagenome. (B) Differences in the abundance of resistance genes were assessed by calculating the ratio of resistance gene copy number (ARG) to 16S rRNA gene copy number per sample as detected by qPCR. Columns denoted by the same letter are not statistically significant (P > 0.05) within each resistance type. Error bars represent the SEM. (C) Bray-Curtis similarity coefficients were calculated from qPCR-derived resistance gene abundance data and plotted in a multidimensional scaling graph. The distance between points indicates the degree of difference in the diversity of resistance genes between samples. The medicated sample outlier (square) is from one medicated pig on day 21. Measures for day 0 samples are not shown.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Cromwell GL. Why and how antibiotics are used in swine production. Anim Biotechnol. 2002;13:7–27. - PubMed
    1. Dibner JJ, Richards JD. Antibiotic growth promoters in agriculture: History and mode of action. Poult Sci. 2005;84:634–643. - PubMed
    1. Lipsitch M, Singer RS, Levin BR. Antibiotics in agriculture: When is it time to close the barn door? Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002;99:5752–5754. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Levy SB. Emergence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria in the intestinal flora of farm inhabitants. J Infect Dis. 1978;137:689–690. - PubMed
    1. Aarestrup FM, Wegener HC. The effects of antibiotic usage in food animals on the development of antimicrobial resistance of importance for humans in Campylobacter and Escherichia coli. Microbes Infect. 1999;1:639–644. - PubMed

Publication types

Substances