Changes in the clearance of total and unbound etoposide in patients with liver dysfunction
- PMID: 2230875
- DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1990.8.11.1874
Changes in the clearance of total and unbound etoposide in patients with liver dysfunction
Abstract
The disposition of total and non-protein-bound etoposide was investigated in 21 cancer patients receiving etoposide and cisplatin combination chemotherapy. Etoposide plasma concentrations were determined using a specific high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) method, and etoposide plasma protein binding was determined by equilibrium dialysis. The patients had a wide range of renal function (creatinine clearance, 32 to 159 mL/min/m2) and hepatic function (total bilirubin range, 0.3 to 21.5 mg/dL; aspartate aminotransferase [AST] range, 14 to 415 IU/L; serum albumin range, 2.7 to 4.1 g/dL). The mean etoposide total systemic clearance was not different in 15 patients with total bilirubin less than 1.0 mg/dL versus six patients with total bilirubin 1.1 to 21.5 mg/dL (18.7 +/- 5.9 mL/min/m2 v 26.4 +/- 10.7 mL/min/m2; t-test P = .06), with a trend toward higher total clearance in the patients with abnormal bilirubin values. However, the mean clearance of unbound etoposide was significantly lower in patients with increased total bilirubin (220 +/- 90 mL/min/m2 v 135 +/- 61 mL/min/m2; t-test P = .027). The fraction of etoposide unbound (fu) in plasma was significantly higher in patients with increased bilirubin (9% +/- 3% v 27% +/- 15%; t-test P = .002), explaining the trend toward higher total clearance in these patients. Etoposide clearance (total or unbound) in the 14 patients with measurable hepatic metastases was not different from the clearance in the seven patients without hepatic metastases. This study provides an explanation for why patients with increased bilirubin do not have lower total systemic clearance of etoposide, and indicates that such patients have a higher exposure to unbound etoposide. The results of ongoing pharmacodynamic studies of total and unbound etoposide in patients with increased bilirubin will determine the clinical relevance of altered etoposide protein binding.
Similar articles
-
Disposition of total and unbound etoposide following high-dose therapy.Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 1993;32(4):273-8. doi: 10.1007/BF00686172. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 1993. PMID: 8324869
-
Etoposide pharmacokinetics in patients with normal and abnormal organ function.J Clin Oncol. 1986 Nov;4(11):1690-5. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1986.4.11.1690. J Clin Oncol. 1986. PMID: 3772420
-
Pharmacokinetics of oral etoposide in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 1999;43(4):287-94. doi: 10.1007/s002800050897. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 1999. PMID: 10071979
-
Use of etoposide in patients with organ dysfunction: pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic considerations.Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 1994;34 Suppl:S76-83. doi: 10.1007/BF00684868. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 1994. PMID: 8070032 Review.
-
Etoposide. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic potential in combination chemotherapy of cancer.Drugs. 1990 Mar;39(3):438-90. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199039030-00008. Drugs. 1990. PMID: 2184009 Review. No abstract available.
Cited by
-
Camptothecin and podophyllotoxin derivatives: inhibitors of topoisomerase I and II - mechanisms of action, pharmacokinetics and toxicity profile.Drug Saf. 2006;29(3):209-30. doi: 10.2165/00002018-200629030-00005. Drug Saf. 2006. PMID: 16524321 Review.
-
Disposition of total and unbound etoposide following high-dose therapy.Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 1993;32(4):273-8. doi: 10.1007/BF00686172. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 1993. PMID: 8324869
-
Drug administration in chronic liver disease.Drug Saf. 1997 Jul;17(1):47-73. doi: 10.2165/00002018-199717010-00004. Drug Saf. 1997. PMID: 9258630 Review.
-
Etoposide dosage and pharmacodynamics.Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 1994;34 Suppl:S69-75. doi: 10.1007/BF00684867. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 1994. PMID: 8070031 Review.
-
Practical treatment guide for dose individualisation in cancer chemotherapy.Drugs. 1998 Dec;56(6):1019-38. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199856060-00006. Drugs. 1998. PMID: 9878990 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources