Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1990 Aug;18(4):293-311.
doi: 10.1007/BF01062270.

Comparison of methods to calculate cyclosporine A bioavailability from consecutive oral and intravenous doses

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Comparison of methods to calculate cyclosporine A bioavailability from consecutive oral and intravenous doses

M O Karlsson et al. J Pharmacokinet Biopharm. 1990 Aug.

Abstract

The pharmacokinetics of cyclosporine A (CyA) was studied in 21 uremic patients. The plasma concentrations after an oral dose and a subsequent short-term infusion were analyzed simultaneously by nonlinear regression. Bi- and triexponential disposition models with either zero- or first-order absorption were fitted to the data. A triexponential disposition model with zero-order absorption was generally found to best describe the concentration-time profile. The bioavailability and clearance were estimated to be 0.24 +/- 0.10 and 21 +/- 8 L/hr, respectively. These values differed only marginally from those predicted by the other models. Similar bioavailability estimates were also obtained from a three-compartment model where elimination was assumed saturable, from a deconvolution procedure, and from analyses based on blood concentrations. Markedly higher bioavailabilities (0.34 +/- 0.13) were obtained when a model-independent AUC correction procedure, commonly used to calculate CyA bioavailability, was used. The difference could not be explained by poor description of data in the model-dependent analyses, but rather by overestimation in the model-independent analyses mainly due to errors in the extrapolations used. Thus, by the simultaneous fitting procedure, which is a new approach for estimating CyA bioavailability, drawbacks of the AUC correction procedure could be avoided. Further, future studies of CyA bioavailability could be designed with a markedly shorter and more convenient length of time if analyzed by the proposed method.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Transplant Proc. 1988 Apr;20(2 Suppl 2):529-35 - PubMed
    1. Transplantation. 1984 Nov;38(5):511-3 - PubMed
    1. Transplantation. 1985 Nov;40(5):457-76 - PubMed
    1. Transplant Proc. 1987 Feb;19(1 Pt 2):1719 - PubMed
    1. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1985 Sep;38(3):296-300 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources