Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2012 Jun;20(6):1143-51.
doi: 10.1007/s00167-012-1912-y. Epub 2012 Feb 8.

Variability in leg muscle power and hop performance after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Variability in leg muscle power and hop performance after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Roland Thomeé et al. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012 Jun.

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this prospective study was to describe the variability in leg muscle power and hop performance up to 2 years among patients following ACL reconstruction and specifically to illustrate the effects of various criteria for an acceptable level of muscle function.

Methods: Eighty-two patients (56 men and 26 women)with a mean age of 28 years, who underwent ACL reconstruction using either hamstring tendons (n = 46) or a patellar tendon (n = 36), were assessed pre-operatively and 3, 6, 12 and 24 months post-surgery with a battery of three lower extremity muscle power tests and a battery of three hop tests.

Results: Leg symmetry index (LSI) values at group level ranged between 73 and 100% at all follow-ups. When the tests were evaluated individually, patients reached an average LSI of ≥ 90% at 24 months. The success rate at 24 months for the muscle power test battery, that is,patients with an LSI of ≥ 90% in all three tests, was 48 and 44% for the hop test battery. The success rate at 24 months for both test batteries on all six muscle function tests was 22%. The criterion of an LSI of ≥ 80% resulted in 53% of the patients having an acceptable level on all six tests,while with a criterion of an LSI of ≥ 100%, none of the patients reached an acceptable level.

Conclusion: At group level and in single muscle function tests, the muscle function outcome 1 and 2 years after ACL reconstruction is satisfactory in the present study and on a par with the results presented in the literature. However,when using more demanding criteria for a successful muscle function outcome, using batteries of tests or increasing the acceptable LSI level from ≥ 90% to ≥ 95%or ≥ 100%, the results are considered to be poor. It is suggested that this should be taken into consideration when presenting results after ACL rehabilitation, deciding on the criteria for a safe return to sports, or designing rehabilitation programmes after ACL reconstruction.

Level of evidence: Prognostic prospective cohort study, Level I.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2010 Dec;62(12):1706-14 - PubMed
    1. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2010 Nov;18(11):1587-93 - PubMed
    1. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2009 Mar;17(3):284-90 - PubMed
    1. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000 Aug;32(8):1472-9 - PubMed
    1. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2008 Feb;16(2):118-27 - PubMed

Publication types