Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation

The nutritional risk in oncology: a study of 1,453 cancer outpatients

Federico Bozzetti et al. Support Care Cancer. 2012 Aug.

Erratum in

  • Support Care Cancer. 2012 Aug;20(8):1929. Capuano, Giovanni [corrected to Capuano, Giorgio]

Abstract

Purpose: There is little information about the nutritional status of cancer outpatients because the practice of nutritional screening is rarely performed. This study aims to define the pattern of scores of nutritional risk in 1,453 outpatients and factors associated with a high nutrition risk score, to facilitate the identification of such patients by the oncologists.

Methods: We prospectively screened the nutritional status of cancer outpatients according to the NRS-2002 score which combines indicators of malnutrition and of severity of the disease (1-3 points, respectively). A score ≥ 3 indicates "nutritional risk". The association of the nutritional scores with some patient/tumour/therapy-related variables was investigated through univariable and multivariable linear regression models.

Results: Thirty-two percent of outpatients were at nutritional risk. Primary tumour site, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score and presence of anorexia or fatigue were significantly associated with the nutrition risk score. Depending on the combination of these variables, it was possible to estimate different probabilities of nutritional risk.

Conclusions: The frequency of a relevant nutritional risk was higher than expected considering the favourably selected population. The nutritional risk was associated with common clinical variables which are usually recorded in the charts and could easily alert the oncologist on the need of a further nutritional assessment or a nutritional support.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Lochs H, Allison SP, Meier R, et al. Introductory to the ESPEN guidelines on enteral nutrition: terminology, definitions, and general topics. Clin Nutr. 2006;25:180–186. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2006.02.007. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kondrup J, Rasmussen HH, Hamberg O, Stanga Z, Ad Hoc ESPEN Working Group Nutritional risk screening (NRS 2002): a new method based on an analysis of controlled clinical trials. Clin Nutr. 2003;22:321–336. doi: 10.1016/S0261-5614(02)00214-5. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Elia M, Zellipour L, Stratton RJ. To screen or not to screen for adult malnutrition? Clin Nutr. 2005;24:867–884. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2005.03.004. - DOI - PubMed
    1. McWhirter JP, Pennington CR. Incidence and recognition of malnutrition in 239 hospitals. BMJ. 1994;308:945–948. doi: 10.1136/bmj.308.6934.945. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Orrevall Y, Tishelman C, Permert J, Cederholm T. Nutritional support and risk status among cancer patients in palliative home care services. Support Care Cancer. 2009;17:153–161. doi: 10.1007/s00520-008-0467-4. - DOI - PubMed