Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Feb 9;366(6):530-8.
doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1104816.

Sources of regional variation in Medicare Part D drug spending

Affiliations

Sources of regional variation in Medicare Part D drug spending

Julie M Donohue et al. N Engl J Med. .

Abstract

Background: Sources of regional variation in spending for prescription drugs under Medicare Part D are poorly understood, and such variation may reflect differences in health status, use of effective treatments, or selection of branded drugs over lower-cost generics.

Methods: We analyzed 2008 Medicare data for 4.7 million beneficiaries for prescription-drug use and expenditures overall and in three drug categories: angiotensin-converting-enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and angiotensin-receptor blockers (ARBs), 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors (statins), and selective serotonin-reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs). Differences in per capita expenditures across hospital-referral regions (HRRs) were decomposed into annual prescription volume and cost per prescription. The ratio of prescriptions filled as branded drugs to all prescriptions filled was calculated. We adjusted all measures for demographic, socioeconomic, and health-status differences.

Results: Mean adjusted per capita pharmaceutical spending ranged from $2,413 in the lowest to $3,008 in the highest quintile of HRRs. Most (75.9%) of that difference was attributable to the cost per prescription ($53 vs. $63). Regional differences in cost per prescription explained 87.5% of expenditure variation for ACE inhibitors and ARBs and 56.3% for statins but only 36.1% for SSRIs and SNRIs. The ratio of branded-drug to total prescriptions, which correlated highly with cost per prescription, ranged across HRRs from 0.24 to 0.45 overall and from 0.24 to 0.55 for ACE inhibitors and ARBs, 0.29 to 0.60 for statins, and 0.15 to 0.51 for SSRIs and SNRIs.

Conclusions: Regional variation in Medicare Part D spending results largely from differences in the cost of drugs selected rather than prescription volume. A reduction in branded-drug use in some regions through modification of Part D plan benefits might lower costs without reducing quality of care. (Funded by the National Institute on Aging and others.).

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Ratio of Prescriptions for Branded Drugs to Total Prescriptions Filled in Hospital-Referral Regions in 2008, According to Drug Category and Quintile of Per Capita Spending
The three drug categories shown are angiotensin- converting–enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and angiotensin-receptor blockers (ARBs) (Panel A), 3-hydroxy-3-methyl-glutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors (statins) (Panel B), and selective serotonin-reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and serotonin–norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) (Panel C). Measures for spending and the ratio of branded-drug prescriptions to total prescriptions were adjusted for age, sex, race or ethnic group, ZIP Code–level income and rate of poverty, low-income subsidy status, institutional-residence status, and prescription-drug Hierarchical Condition Category (RxHCC) score.

Comment in

References

    1. Fisher ES, Bynum JP, Skinner JS. Slowing the growth of health care costs — lessons from regional variation. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:849–52. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sutherland JM, Fisher ES, Skinner JS. Getting past denial — the high cost of health care in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:1227–30. - PubMed
    1. Fisher ES, Wennberg DE, Stukel TA, Gottlieb DJ, Lucas FL, Pinder EL. The implications of regional variations in Medicare spending. Part 1: the content, quality, and accessibility of care. Ann Intern Med. 2003;138:273–87. - PubMed
    1. The implications of regional variations in Medicare spending. Part 2: health outcomes and satisfaction with care. Ann Intern Med. 2003;138:288–98. Idem. - PubMed
    1. Yasaitis L, Fisher ES, Skinner JS, Chandra A. Hospital quality and intensity of spending: is there an association? Health Aff (Millwood) 2009;28(4):w566–w572. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances