Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 May 20;29(8):1548-55.
doi: 10.1089/neu.2011.2226. Epub 2012 Apr 18.

The health and life priorities of individuals with spinal cord injury: a systematic review

Lisa A Simpson  1 , Janice J Eng, Jane T C Hsieh, Dalton L Wolfe; Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation Evidence Scire Research Team
Affiliations

The health and life priorities of individuals with spinal cord injury: a systematic review

Lisa A Simpson et al. J Neurotrauma. .

Abstract

Determining the priorities of individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) can assist in choosing research priorities that will ultimately improve their quality of life. This systematic review examined studies that directly surveyed people with SCI to ascertain their health priorities and life domains of importance. Twenty-four studies (a combined sample of 5262 subjects) that met the inclusion criteria were identified using electronic databases (Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, and PsycINFO). The questionnaire methods and domains of importance were reviewed and described. While the questionnaires varied across studies, a consistent set of priorities emerged. Functional recovery priorities were identified for the following areas: motor function (including arm/hand function for individuals with tetraplegia, and mobility for individuals with paraplegia), bowel, bladder, and sexual function. In addition, health, as well as relationships, emerged as important life domains. The information from this study, which identified the priorities and domains of importance for individuals with SCI, may be useful for informing health care and research agenda-setting activities.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

AUTHOR DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

The authors report no disclosures. No competing financial interests exist for any of the authors.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Model of subjective QOL (adapted from Dijkers MP. (2003) Individualization in quality of life measurement: Instruments and approaches. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 84(4 suppl 2), S3–14.)
Figure 2
Figure 2
Flowchart of article selection process
Figure 3
Figure 3
Summary of review findings
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Anderson D, Dumont S, Azzaria L, Bourdais ML, Noreau L. Determinants of return to work among spinal cord injury patients: A literature review. J Vocat Rehabil. 2007;27:57–68.
    1. Anderson KD. Targeting recovery: Priorities of the spinal cord-injured population. J Neurotrauma. 2004;21:1371–1383. - PubMed
    1. Anderson KD, Friden J, Lieber RL. Acceptable benefits and risks associated with surgically improving arm function in individuals living with cervical spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2009;47:334–338. - PubMed
    1. Backman C, Forwell S, Carpenter C, Jongbloed L. Priority issues for British Columbians living with spinal cord injury. Int J Disabil Community Rehabil. 2007:6. Retrieved from http://www.ijdcr.ca/VOL06_01_CAN/articles/backman.shtml.
    1. Benony H, Daloz L, Bungener C, Chahraoui K, Frenay C, Auvin J. Emotional factors and subjective quality of life in subjects with spinal cord injuries. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;81:437–445. - PubMed

Publication types