The detection of clinically relevant contact allergens with a standard screening tray of 28 allergens
- PMID: 22320669
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.2011.02022.x
The detection of clinically relevant contact allergens with a standard screening tray of 28 allergens
Abstract
Background: A standard method for diagnosing allergic contact dermatitis in the United States is the thin-layer rapid use epicutaneous (TRUE) test (TRUE Test™), which consists of three panels containing 20 individual allergens and eight allergen mixes. Previous studies had raised concern regarding the adequacy of the initial two-panel TRUE Test™ system (16 individual allergens and seven allergen mixes) in fully assessing patients with possible allergic contact dermatitis.
Objectives: We sought to investigate the effectiveness of the current three-panel TRUE Test™ as the sole diagnostic tool for detecting allergic contact dermatitis.
Patients/materials/methods: This study was a retrospective analysis of 2088 patients who underwent patch testing between 1995 and 2010. Study groups were analysed to determine whether positive reactions were to allergens and/or mixes present in the TRUE Test™ panels.
Results: Of the 2088 patch-tested patients, 1385 had at least one positive reaction. Among these 1385 patients, 27.6% were fully evaluated by use of only the TRUE Test™ series, 49.9% were partially evaluated, and 22.5% did not have any of their allergens detected. On assessment for clinical relevance, similar percentages were observed.
Conclusion: In our study, the current TRUE Test™ series of 28 allergens would have completely identified allergens in only 27.6% of patients. Broadening the standard panel to include common allergens causing >50% of allergic contact dermatitis cases in a given geographical location and aim testing allergens on the basis of the patient's history will increase the test's sensitivity.
© 2012 John Wiley & Sons A/S.
Similar articles
-
The detection of clinically relevant contact allergens using a standard screening tray of twenty-three allergens.J Am Acad Dermatol. 2003 Jul;49(1):65-9. doi: 10.1067/mjd.2003.489. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2003. PMID: 12833010
-
Results of patch testing to personal care product allergens in a standard series and a supplemental cosmetic series: an analysis of 945 patients from the Mayo Clinic Contact Dermatitis Group, 2000-2007.J Am Acad Dermatol. 2010 Nov;63(5):789-98. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2009.11.033. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2010. PMID: 20643495
-
A multi-center, retrospective review of patch testing for contact dermatitis in allergy practices.Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2011 Dec;107(6):487-92. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2011.09.004. Epub 2011 Oct 5. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2011. PMID: 22123377
-
Patch testing with a standard allergen ("screening") tray: rewards and risks.Dermatol Ther. 2004;17(3):231-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1396-0296.2004.04033.x. Dermatol Ther. 2004. PMID: 15186369 Review.
-
Epicutaneous patch testing.Eur J Dermatol. 2002 Sep-Oct;12(5):506-13. Eur J Dermatol. 2002. PMID: 12370148 Review.
Cited by
-
Importance of Supplemental Patch Testing Beyond a Screening Series for Patients With Dermatitis: The North American Contact Dermatitis Group Experience.JAMA Dermatol. 2021 Dec 1;157(12):1456-1465. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2021.4314. JAMA Dermatol. 2021. PMID: 34730775 Free PMC article.
-
A Practical Approach to Chronic Hand Eczema.Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2025 Jul;15(7):1953-1971. doi: 10.1007/s13555-025-01433-y. Epub 2025 May 18. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2025. PMID: 40382744 Free PMC article.
-
Skin Toxicity of Selected Hair Cosmetic Ingredients: A Review Focusing on Hairdressers.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jun 21;19(13):7588. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19137588. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022. PMID: 35805241 Free PMC article.
-
Hand dermatitis: an allergist's nightmare.Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2014 Nov;14(11):474. doi: 10.1007/s11882-014-0474-0. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2014. PMID: 25228264 Review.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources