[Clinical evaluation on the coaxial 1.8 mm microincision cataract surgery]
- PMID: 22321500
[Clinical evaluation on the coaxial 1.8 mm microincision cataract surgery]
Abstract
Objective: To study and compare the outcomes of coaxial 1.8 mm microincision phacoemulsification with conventional coaxial 3 mm small-incision cataract surgery.
Methods: A randomized prospective study was conducted on 89 patients with age-related cataract: coaxial 1.8 mm microincision cataract surgery (MICS group) was performed in 45 cases (45 eyes), and coaxial 3 mm small-incision cataract surgery (SICS group) was performed in 44 cases (44 eyes). Statistical analysis was taken with the data of 40 cases (40 eyes) in the MICS group and 40 cases (40 eyes) in the SICS group. The average ultrasound power (AVE) and effective phacoemulsification time (EPT) were recorded during the operation. Visual acuity, endothelial cell density and cornea thickness were compared at intervals of 1 day, 1 week, 1 month and 3 months after surgery. In addition, surgically induced astigmatism (SIA) was analyzed. Statistic analysis was taken by student's t test and chi square test.
Results: There was no significant difference on AVE and EPT (P > 0.05) between these two groups. One day after the surgery, the MICS group showed better uncorrected visual acuity (0.16 ± 0.14) as compared to the SICS group (0.23 ± 0.12). The difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences on best corrected visual acuity, endothelial cell density and cornea thickness between these two groups. One week, 1 month and 3 months after the surgery, SIA was (0.62 ± 0.28) D, (0.48 ± 0.28) D, (0.47 ± 0.25) D, (0.40 ± 0.24) D in the MICS group, and (1.27 ± 0.65) D, (1.18 ± 0.59) D, (1.02 ± 0.56) D, (0.79 ± 0.48) D in the SICS group, respectively. The differences between the MIC and SICS groups were statistically significant (P < 0.01). SIA decreased significantly and became stable 1 week after surgery in MICS group, while the similar tendency appeared one month after the surgery in the SICS group.
Conclusions: Coaxial 1.8 mm microincision cataract surgery could significantly reduce SIA and obtain more stable astigmatism status. This suggests that the coaxial MICS phacoemulsification surgery could get earlier visual rehabilitation postoperatively.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of efficacy between coaxial microincision and standard-incision phacoemulsification in patients with age-related cataracts: a meta-analysis.BMC Ophthalmol. 2017 Dec 29;17(1):267. doi: 10.1186/s12886-017-0661-6. BMC Ophthalmol. 2017. PMID: 29284444 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Outcomes of microincision cataract surgery versus coaxial phacoemulsification.Ophthalmology. 2005 Nov;112(11):1997-2003. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2005.06.024. Epub 2005 Sep 23. Ophthalmology. 2005. PMID: 16183129 Clinical Trial.
-
Comparison of surgically induced astigmatism after coaxial phacoemulsification through 1.8 mm microincision and bimanual phacoemulsification through 1.7 mm microincision.J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009 Sep;35(9):1563-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.04.037. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009. PMID: 19683153
-
[Clinical evaluation on the bimanual microincision cataract surgery].Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. 2008 Jun;44(6):525-8. Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. 2008. PMID: 19035244 Clinical Trial. Chinese.
-
[New progresses in micro-incision cataract surgery].Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. 2012 Apr;48(4):369-73. Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. 2012. PMID: 22800458 Review. Chinese.
Cited by
-
Different-sized incisions for phacoemulsification in age-related cataract.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Sep 20;9(9):CD010510. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010510.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017. PMID: 28931202 Free PMC article.
-
Long-Term Visual Quality after Microincision Cataract Surgery.J Ophthalmol. 2020 Sep 15;2020:9318436. doi: 10.1155/2020/9318436. eCollection 2020. J Ophthalmol. 2020. PMID: 33014445 Free PMC article.
-
Coaxial Microincision Cataract Surgery versus Standard Coaxial Small-Incision Cataract Surgery: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.PLoS One. 2016 Jan 8;11(1):e0146676. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0146676. eCollection 2016. PLoS One. 2016. PMID: 26745279 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of efficacy between coaxial microincision and standard-incision phacoemulsification in patients with age-related cataracts: a meta-analysis.BMC Ophthalmol. 2017 Dec 29;17(1):267. doi: 10.1186/s12886-017-0661-6. BMC Ophthalmol. 2017. PMID: 29284444 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical