Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Jan;185(1):59-72.
doi: 10.1007/s10661-012-2533-0. Epub 2012 Feb 10.

Assessment of indoor airborne contamination in a wastewater treatment plant

Affiliations

Assessment of indoor airborne contamination in a wastewater treatment plant

Juliana V Teixeira et al. Environ Monit Assess. 2013 Jan.

Abstract

The main objective of this work was to quantify and characterize the major indoor air contaminants present in different stages of a municipal WWTP, including microorganisms (bacteria and fungi), carbon dioxide, carbon monoxide, hydrogen sulfide ammonia, formaldehyde, and volatile organic compounds (VOCs). In general, the total bacteria concentration was found to vary from 60 to >52,560 colony-forming units (CFU)/m(3), and the total fungi concentration ranged from 369 to 14,068 CFU/m(3). Generally, Gram-positive bacteria were observed in higher number than Gram-negative bacteria. CO(2) concentration ranged from 251 to 9,710 ppm, and CO concentration was either not detected or presented a level of 1 ppm. H(2)S concentration ranged from 0.1 to 6.0 ppm. NH(3) concentration was <2 ppm in most samples. Formaldehyde was <0.01 ppm at all sampling sites. The total VOC concentration ranged from 36 to 1,724 μg/m(3). Among the VOCs, toluene presented the highest concentration. Results point to indoor/outdoor ratios higher than one. In general, the highest levels of airborne contaminants were detected at the primary treatment (SEDIPAC 3D), secondary sedimentation, and sludge dehydration. At most sampling sites, the concentrations of airborne contaminants were below the occupational exposure limits (OELs) for all the campaigns. However, a few contaminants were above OELs in some sampling sites.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng. 2006;41(1):77-85 - PubMed
    1. Environ Sci Technol. 2011 Apr 15;45(8):3282-7 - PubMed
    1. Front Biosci (Schol Ed). 2011 Jan 01;3:393-407 - PubMed
    1. Environ Technol. 2008 Jun;29(6):673-9 - PubMed
    1. Anal Chim Acta. 2006 Aug 18;576(1):100-11 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources