Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Jul 1;17(4):e689-96.
doi: 10.4317/medoral.17631.

Cranial base and maxillary changes in patients treated with Frankel' s functional regulator (1b)

Affiliations

Cranial base and maxillary changes in patients treated with Frankel' s functional regulator (1b)

Juan-Jose Alió-Sanz et al. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. .

Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to assess cranial base and maxillary growth in patients with Class II-type I malocclusions when treated with Frankel' s functional regulator (FR-1b).

Study design: The treatment group was made up of 43 patients that were divided into two groups: prepubescent (n: 28), and pubescent (n: 15). The control group included 40 patients who did not receive any kind of treatment and were likewise divided into a prepubescent group (n: 19), and a pubescent group (n: 21). A computerized cephalometric study was carried out and superimpositions were done in order to assess the antero-posterior, vertical and rotational movement of the maxilla.

Results: The results indicate that anterior cranial length is not affected by the regulator but the cranial deflection of the treatment group was diminished. Although a slight counterclockwise rotation effect on the upper jaw was observed due to treatment, no growth restriction of the maxilla in a vertical or antero-posterior direction was observed compared to other non-treated Class II-type I malocclusion patients.

Conclusion: The functional regulator does not have any effect on anterior cranial length, but it does affect the angulation of the cranial base. According to our results, the appliance has demonstrated a flattening effect of the cranial base (p<0.05) in the treated sample. The functional regulator induces counterclockwise rotation rather than vertical or sagittal changes in the maxilla.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Cephalometric measurements used in this study. N(nasion), S(sella turcica), Ba(basion), Cf(pterygomaxillary), Po(porion), Or(suborbital), A(point A), ANS(anterior nasal spine), PNS(posterior nasal spine), Co(condylion).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Superimposition of the maxilla. Ba-N plane at Nasion point. Anterior cranial length(CC-N): distance between CC and nasion.; Cranial deflection(N-Ba/Po-Or): angle formed between the basion-nasion plane and the Frankfurt plane; SNA angle: angle formed by the sella turcica-nasion(S-N) and nasion-point A(N-A) planes; Maxillary depth(Po-Or/N-A): angle formed by the Frankfurt plane and the N-A plane; Distance from point A to the nasion perpendicular to Frankfurt (A-FHp): distance between point A and a line perpendicular to the Frankfurt plane (Po-Or) that descend from the nasion(N); Effective maxillary length(Co-A): distance from the highest and most posterior part of the condylion(Co) to the maximum concavity of the anterior maxillary outline(point A); Maxillary height: angle formed by the nasion-Cf and Cf-point A planes, where Cf is defined as the intersection of the pterygoid plane(PtV) and the Frankfurt plane; Slope of the palatal plane(Po-Or/ANS-PNS): angle formed by the Frankfurt plane and palatal plane; A: the maximum concavity of the anterior maxillary outline(point A); ANS: anterior nasal spine; PNS: posterior nasal spine; Pp: palatal plane.

Similar articles

References

    1. Proffit WR, Fields HW, Moray LJ. Prevalence of malocclusion and orthodontic treatment need in the United States: estimates from the NHANES-III survey. Int J Adult Orthod Orthognath Surg. 1998;13:97–106. - PubMed
    1. Willems G, De Bruyne I, Verdonck A, Fieuws S, Carels C. Prevalence of dentofacial characteristics in a belgian orthodontic population. Clin Oral Investig. 2001 ;5:220–6. - PubMed
    1. Freeman DC, McNamara JA Jr, Baccetti T, Franchi L, Fränkel C. Long-term treatment effects of the FR-2 appliance of Fränkel. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009 ;135:570.e1–6. - PubMed
    1. Kurosawa M, Ando K, Goto S. Class II Division 1 malocclusion with a high mandibular plane angle corrected with 2-phase treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009;135:241–51. - PubMed
    1. Frankel R. The theoretical concept underlying the treatment with function correctors. Rep Congr Eur Orthod Soc. 1966;42:233–54. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources