Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Sep 1;17(5):e845-51.
doi: 10.4317/medoral.17698.

Effects on the maxilla and cranial base caused by cervical headgear: a longitudinal study

Affiliations

Effects on the maxilla and cranial base caused by cervical headgear: a longitudinal study

Juan Alió-Sanz et al. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. .

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study is to test the possible orthopedic effects of cervical headgear on the cranial base and maxilla.

Study design: a sample consisting of 79 subjects with skeletal class II malocclusion was divided into two groups. The experimental group was made up of 41 patients all treated with cervical headgear. The control group included a total of 38 non-treated patients. Each one of these groups was then subdivided according to age into one of three groups: prepubescent, pubescent or post-pubescent. Cephalometric parameters were compared in both groups in order to measure the cranial base angle and the vertical and sagittal position of the maxilla. Additionally, cephalometric superimpositions taken at the beginning and end of the study were compared.

Results: results revealed significant differences in the cranial base angle and in the SNA angle (p<0.05). However, no differences were observed in the variables that measure the maxillomandibular relationship. While no changes were noted in the palatal plane slope, a flattening of the cranial base was found caused by the cervical headgear, in addition to a retrusion of point A that does not mean there was a reduction in the maxillomandibular relationship.

Conclusions: cervical headgear treatment induces cephalometric flattening of the cranial base and a decrease of the SNA angle.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Culbert MR. A simple, efficient headgear of vinyl plastic belting. Am J Orthod. 1949;35:776–9. - PubMed
    1. Bollen AM. Interceptive orthodontic treatment of Class II malocclusions is slightly more successful with headgear/biteplane than with bionator treatment. J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2011;11:58–9. - PubMed
    1. Abed Y, Brin I. Early headgear effect on the eruption pattern of maxillary second molars. Angle Orthod. 2010;80:454–60. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Armi P, Cozza P, Baccetti T. Effect of RME and headgear treatment on the eruption of palatally displaced canines: a randomized clinical study. Angle Orthod. 2011;81:370–4. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Godt A, Koos B, Hagen H, Göz G. Changes in upper airway width associated with Class II treatments (headgear vs activator) and different growth patterns. Angle Orthod. 2011;81:440–6. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types