Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Jul-Aug;19(4):506-13.
doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000422. Epub 2012 Feb 9.

The impact of PACS on clinician work practices in the intensive care unit: a systematic review of the literature

Isla M Hains  1 , Andrew Georgiou, Johanna I Westbrook
Affiliations

The impact of PACS on clinician work practices in the intensive care unit: a systematic review of the literature

Isla M Hains et al. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2012 Jul-Aug.

Abstract

Objective: To assess evidence of the impact of Picture Archiving and Communication Systems (PACS) on clinicians' work practices in the intensive care unit (ICU).

Methods: We searched Medline, Pre-Medline, CINAHL, Embase, and the SPIE Digital Library databases for English-language publications between 1980 and September 2010 using Medical Subject Headings terms and keywords.

Results: Eleven studies from the USA and UK were included. All studies measured aspects of time associated with the introduction of PACS, namely the availability of images, the time a physician took to review an image, and changes in viewing patterns. Seven studies examined the impact on clinical decision-making, with the majority measuring the time to image-based clinical action. The effect of PACS on communication modes was reported in five studies.

Discussion: PACS can impact on clinician work practices in three main areas. Most of the evidence suggests an improvement in the efficiency of work practices. Quick image availability can impact on work associated with clinical decision-making, although the results were inconsistent. PACS can change communication practices, particularly between the ICU and radiology; however, the evidence base is insufficient to draw firm conclusions in this area.

Conclusion: The potential for PACS to impact positively on clinician work practices in the ICU and improve patient care is great. However, the evidence base is limited and does not reflect aspects of contemporary PACS technology. Performance measures developed in previous studies remain relevant, with much left to investigate to understand how PACS can support new and improved ways of delivering care in the intensive care setting.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Process by which studies were included in the review. *Some papers were excluded under more than one exclusion criterion. PACS, Picture Archiving and Communication Systems.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Hirschorn DS. Introduction. In: Dreyer KJ, Hirschorn DS, Thrall JH, et al., eds. PACS: A Guide to the Digital Revolution. New York: Springer, 2006:3–7
    1. Faggioni L, Neri E, Castellana C, et al. The future of PACS in healthcare enterprises. Eur J Radiol 2011;78:253–8 - PubMed
    1. Caramella D. Is PACS research and development still necessary? Int Congr Ser 2005;1281:11–14
    1. Huang HK. Enterprise PACS and image distribution. Comput Med Imaging Graph 2003;27:241–53 - PubMed
    1. van de Wetering R, Batenburg R. A PACS maturity model: a systematic meta-analytic review on maturation and evolvability of PACS in the hospital enterprise. Int J Med Inform 2009;78:127–40 - PubMed

Publication types