Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Case Reports
. 2012 Jun;129(6):1337-1344.
doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31824ec310.

Repair of Tessier no. 3 and no. 4 craniofacial clefts with facial unit and muscle repositioning by midface rotation advancement without Z-plasties

Philip Kuo-Ting Chen  1 , Frank Chun-Shin Chang, Fuan-Chiang Chan, Yu-Ray Chen, M Samuel Noordhoff
Affiliations
Case Reports

Repair of Tessier no. 3 and no. 4 craniofacial clefts with facial unit and muscle repositioning by midface rotation advancement without Z-plasties

Philip Kuo-Ting Chen et al. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012 Jun.

Abstract

Background: The accepted surgical correction of Tessier no. 3 and no. 4 craniofacial clefts is the use of interdigitating skin flaps along the line of the facial cleft, which frequently results in unsightly facial scars, poor skin color match, and an unnatural facial expression. The authors report their technique of midface rotation-advancement concept to repair these craniofacial clefts.

Methods: Fourteen patients who had undergone Tessier no. 3 and no. 4 cleft repair over a 35-year period (1976 to 2010) at the craniofacial center in Chang Gung Memorial Hospital were retrospectively reviewed. Five patients (group 1) were operated on using Z-plasty principles. Nine (group 2) were operated on using the rotation-advancement technique; six of them had Tessier no. 3 clefts and three had Tessier no. 4 clefts. Seven of those nine patients were primary cases; the other two had secondary or tertiary revisions. Patient photographs were reviewed to assess outcomes.

Results: Group 1 had a less overall satisfactory result in terms of scar quality, color matching, or natural facial expression. Overall, a much improved appearance with a higher satisfaction rate was demonstrated in group 2. Patients in group 2 who were surgically treated with the midface rotation advancement technique, though their medial canthus and alar base might not have been well repositioned, still had much better results.

Conclusions: Midface rotation advancement avoided significant scarring with poor skin color matching and unnatural facial expressions. This technique is applicable to either the primary repair or secondary revision of Tessier no. 3 and no. 4 craniofacial clefts.

Clinical question/level of evidence: Therapeutic, III.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

References

    1. Resnick. JI, Kawamoto HKJ. Rare craniofacial clefts: Tessier no. 4 clefts. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1990;85:843–849.
    1. van der Meulen. JC. Rare craniofacial clefts: Tessier no. 4 clefts. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1990;85:850–852.
    1. Longaker MT, Lipshutz GS, Kawamoto HKJ. Reconstruction of Tessier no. 4 clefts revisited. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997;99:1501–1507.
    1. Coruh A, Gunay GK. A surgical conundrum: Tessier number 4 cleft. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2005;42:102–106.
    1. Laure B, Picard A, Bonin-Goga B, et al.. Tessier number 4 bilateral orbito-facial cleft: A 26-year follow-up. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2010;38:245–247.

Publication types