Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Aug;470(8):2185-92.
doi: 10.1007/s11999-012-2277-8. Epub 2012 Feb 11.

Are shoulders with a reverse shoulder prosthesis strong enough? A pilot study

Affiliations

Are shoulders with a reverse shoulder prosthesis strong enough? A pilot study

Tjarco D W Alta et al. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Aug.

Abstract

Background: It has been suggested that limited active ROM of reverse shoulder prostheses relates to lack of strength. However, the postoperative strength has not been quantified.

Questions/purposes: We therefore measured joint torques in patients with reverse shoulder prostheses and correlated torques with functional scores.

Methods: We recruited 33 patients (age, 72 ± 8 years) with a reverse prosthesis (37 shoulders, 21 primary and 16 revisions). We obtained Constant-Murley, DASH, and Simple Shoulder Test ([D]SST) scores, and performed two isokinetic protocols (abduction/adduction and external/internal rotation) at 60° per second. Minimum followup was 4 months (average, 23 months; range, 4-63 months).

Results: Twenty-three patients (24 shoulders; 13 primaries, 11 revisions) were able to perform at least one of the defined tasks. Mean abduction and adduction torques were 15 Nm ± 7 Nm and 16 Nm ± 10 Nm (19%-78% of normal shoulders). External and internal rotation tasks could be performed by only 13 patients (14 shoulders; nine primary, five revisions) generating 9 Nm ± 4 Nm and 8 Nm ± 3 Nm, respectively (13%-71% of normal shoulders). We found moderate correlations between Constant-Murley, DASH and (D)SST (D = Dutch translation) scores and abduction and external rotation.

Conclusions: Patients with a reverse prosthesis had reduced strength when compared with normal values reported in the literature (only 65% of patients could perform the protocol). This effect was greatest for external rotation and might explain clinical outcomes with which a moderately strong relationship was observed. Our observations suggest limited strength is a major factor in reduced ROM.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Pearson’s correlation between the maximal abduction and external rotation torque at 60° per second and the postoperative Constant-Murley score show a correlation between the force-generating capacity of patients with a reverse shoulder prosthesis and their postoperative Constant-Murley score for abduction and external rotation.

References

    1. Amako M, Imai T, Okamura K. Recovery of shoulder rotational muscle strength after a combined Bankart and modified Bristow procedure. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2008;17:738–743. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2008.01.145. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ambrosio F, Boninger ML, Souza AL, Fitzgerald SG, Koontz AM, Cooper RA. Biomechanics and strength of manual wheelchair users. J Spinal Cord Med. 2005;28:407–414. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bergmann JH, de Leeuw M, Janssen TW, Veeger DH, Willems WJ. Contribution of the reverse endoprosthesis to glenohumeral kinematics. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466:594–598. doi: 10.1007/s11999-007-0091-5. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bigoni M, Gorla M, Guerrasio S, Brignoli A, Cossio A, Grillo P, Marinoni EC. Shoulder evaluation with isokinetic strength testing after arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2009;18:178–183. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2008.09.002. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Boileau P, Watkinson DJ, Hatzidakis AM, Balg F. Grammont reverse prosthesis: design, rationale, and biomechanics. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2005;14(1 suppl):147S–161S. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2004.10.006. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms