Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 1990;7(2-3):69-85.
doi: 10.1007/BF02988534.

Dietary carcinogens, environmental pollution, and cancer: some misconceptions

Affiliations
Review

Dietary carcinogens, environmental pollution, and cancer: some misconceptions

B N Ames et al. Med Oncol Tumor Pharmacother. 1990.

Abstract

Various misconceptions about dietary carcinogens, pesticide residues, and cancer causation are discussed. The pesticides in our diet are 99.99% natural, since plants make an enormous variety of toxins against fungi, insects, and animal predators. Although only 50 of these natural pesticides have been tested in animal cancer tests, about half of them are carcinogens. About half of all chemicals tested in animal cancer tests are positive. The proportion of natural pesticides positive in animal tests of clastogenicity is also the same as for synthetic chemicals. It is argued that testing chemicals in animals at the maximum tolerated dose primarily measures chronic cell proliferation, a threshold process. Cell proliferation is mutagenic in several ways, including inducing mitotic recombination, and therefore chronic induction of cell proliferation is a risk factor for cancer.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1984 Jun 29;121(3):1027-32 - PubMed
    1. Science. 1987 Apr 17;236(4799):271-80 - PubMed
    1. Mutat Res. 1988 Mar;195(2):151-213 - PubMed
    1. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 1983;18(2):123-201 - PubMed
    1. Cancer Lett. 1985 Jan;25(3):239-45 - PubMed

Publication types