Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Feb 13:5:6.
doi: 10.1186/1754-6834-5-6.

Biohydrogen production from arabinose and glucose using extreme thermophilic anaerobic mixed cultures

Affiliations

Biohydrogen production from arabinose and glucose using extreme thermophilic anaerobic mixed cultures

Angela A Abreu et al. Biotechnol Biofuels. .

Abstract

Background: Second generation hydrogen fermentation technologies using organic agricultural and forestry wastes are emerging. The efficient microbial fermentation of hexoses and pentoses resulting from the pretreatment of lingocellulosic materials is essential for the success of these processes.

Results: Conversion of arabinose and glucose to hydrogen, by extreme thermophilic, anaerobic, mixed cultures was studied in continuous (70°C, pH 5.5) and batch (70°C, pH 5.5 and pH 7) assays. Two expanded granular sludge bed (EGSB) reactors, Rarab and Rgluc, were continuously fed with arabinose and glucose, respectively. No significant differences in reactor performance were observed for arabinose and glucose organic loading rates (OLR) ranging from 4.3 to 7.1 kgCOD m-3 d-1. However, for an OLR of 14.2 kgCOD m-3 d-1, hydrogen production rate and hydrogen yield were higher in Rarab than in Rgluc (average hydrogen production rate of 3.2 and 2.0 LH2 L-1 d-1 and hydrogen yield of 1.10 and 0.75 molH2 mol-1substrate for Rarab and Rgluc, respectively). Lower hydrogen production in Rgluc was associated with higher lactate production. Denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) results revealed no significant difference on the bacterial community composition between operational periods and between the reactors. Increased hydrogen production was observed in batch experiments when hydrogen partial pressure was kept low, both with arabinose and glucose as substrate. Sugars were completely consumed and hydrogen production stimulated (62% higher) when pH 7 was used instead of pH 5.5.

Conclusions: Continuous hydrogen production rate from arabinose was significantly higher than from glucose, when higher organic loading rate was used. The effect of hydrogen partial pressure on hydrogen production from glucose in batch mode was related to the extent of sugar utilization and not to the efficiency of substrate conversion to hydrogen. Furthermore, at pH 7.0, sugars uptake, hydrogen production and yield were higher than at pH 5.5, with both arabinose and glucose as substrates.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Major metabolic pathways for glucose and arabinose fermentation in mixed cultures (adapted from [7,8]).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Effect of OLR on performance of Rarab (a) hydrogen production rate and HRT, (b) soluble fermentation products and residual arabinose.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Effect of OLR on performance of Rgluc (a) hydrogen production rate and HRT, (b) soluble fermentation products and residual glucose.
Figure 4
Figure 4
DGGE profile of granular sludge samples from a reactor fed with arabinose and glucose [6]and at Day 27 and Day 41 from arabinose (and glucose reactors.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Time course of hydrogen production and substrate consumption, O PiH2 ; ■ arabinose; x glucose. a, b) pH 5.5 without headspace flushing. c, d) pH 5.5 with headspace flushing. e, f) pH 7 with headspace flushing.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Time course of soluble fermentation products, O ethanol; lactate; + acetate. a, b) pH 5.5 with headspace flushing. c, d) pH 7 with headspace flushing.

References

    1. Ren Nanqi, Guo Wanqian, Liu Bingfeng, Cao Gauangli, Ding Jie. Biological hydrogen production by dark fermentation: challenges and prospects towards scaled-up production. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2011;22:365–370. doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2011.04.022. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wang JL, Wan W. Factors influencing fermentative hydrogen production: A review. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2009;34:799–811. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.11.015. - DOI
    1. Chieh-Lun Cheng, Yung-Chung Lo, Kuo-Shing Lee, Duu-Jong Lee, Chiu-Yue Lin, Jo-Shu Chang. Biohydrogen production from lignocellulosic feedstock. Bioresour Technol. 2011;102:8514–8523. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2011.04.059. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Xia LM, Sheng XL. High yield cellulase production by Trichoderma reesei ZU-02 on corncob residues. Bioresour Technol. 2004;91:259–262. doi: 10.1016/S0960-8524(03)00195-0. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Strobel HJ. Evidence for catabolite inhibition in regulation of pentose utilization and transport in the ruminal bacterium selenomonas-ruminantium. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1993;59:40–46. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources