Comment
Reference standards for software evaluation
Affiliations
- PMID: 2233375
Item in Clipboard
Comment
Reference standards for software evaluation
Methods Inf Med.
1990 Sep.
Abstract
The field of automated ECG analysis was one of the earliest topics in Medical Informatics and may be regarded as a model both for computer-assisted medical diagnosis and for evaluating medical diagnostic programs. The CSE project has set reference standards of two kinds: In a broad sense, a standard how to perform a comprehensive evaluation study, in a narrow sense, standards as specific references for evaluating computer ECG programs. The evaluation methodology used within the CSE project is described as a basis for presentation of results which are published elsewhere in this issue.
Comment on
-
Common standards for quantitative electrocardiography: goals and main results. CSE Working Party.Methods Inf Med. 1990 Sep;29(4):263-71. Methods Inf Med. 1990. PMID: 2233372
Similar articles
-
A review of computer ECG analysis: time to evaluate and standardize.Crit Rev Med Inform. 1986;1(2):165-207. Crit Rev Med Inform. 1986. PMID: 3333022 Review.
-
Common standards for quantitative electrocardiography: goals and main results. CSE Working Party.Methods Inf Med. 1990 Sep;29(4):263-71. Methods Inf Med. 1990. PMID: 2233372
-
Evaluation of ECG interpretation systems: signal analysis.Methods Inf Med. 1990 Sep;29(4):298-307. Methods Inf Med. 1990. PMID: 2233376
-
Evaluation of ECG interpretation results obtained by computer and cardiologists.Methods Inf Med. 1990 Sep;29(4):308-16. Methods Inf Med. 1990. PMID: 2233377
-
Canadian Colloquium on Computer-Assisted Interpretation of Electrocardiograms. IV. Suggested minimal performance requirements and methods of performance evaluation for computer ECG analysis programs.Can Med Assoc J. 1973 May 19;108(10):1251-9. Can Med Assoc J. 1973. PMID: 4574248 Free PMC article. Review. No abstract available.
Cited by
-
Medical diagnostic decision support systems--past, present, and future: a threaded bibliography and brief commentary.J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1994 Jan-Feb;1(1):8-27. doi: 10.1136/jamia.1994.95236141. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1994. PMID: 7719792 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Reference standards, judges, and comparison subjects: roles for experts in evaluating system performance.J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2002 Jan-Feb;9(1):1-15. doi: 10.1136/jamia.2002.0090001. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2002. PMID: 11751799 Free PMC article.
-
Recommended practices and ethical considerations for natural language processing-assisted observational research: A scoping review.Clin Transl Sci. 2023 Mar;16(3):398-411. doi: 10.1111/cts.13463. Epub 2022 Dec 26. Clin Transl Sci. 2023. PMID: 36478394 Free PMC article.