A prospective audit of the efficacy, safety, and acceptability of low-volume polyethylene glycol (2 L) versus standard volume polyethylene glycol (4 L) versus magnesium citrate plus stimulant laxative as bowel preparation for colonoscopy
- PMID: 22334219
- DOI: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e3182432162
A prospective audit of the efficacy, safety, and acceptability of low-volume polyethylene glycol (2 L) versus standard volume polyethylene glycol (4 L) versus magnesium citrate plus stimulant laxative as bowel preparation for colonoscopy
Abstract
Background: High-quality video colonoscopy requires adequate preparation of the bowel to ensure both adequate procedure completion rates and polyp detection rates. We sought to examine our practice to determine which bowel preparation cleansed most effectively in our patients.
Aim: A prospective audit of the efficacy, safety, and acceptability of low-volume polyethylene glycol (2-L Moviprep; Norgine Pharmaceuticals) versus standard volume polyethylene glycol (4-L KleanPrep; Norgine Pharmaceuticals) versus magnesium citrate (Citramag; Sanochemia UK Ltd.) plus stimulant laxative as bowel preparation for colonoscopy.
Setting: District General Hospital.
Patients: Patients attending for day case colonoscopy.
Interventions: Not applicable.
Main outcome measures: Overall cleansing grades of preparations used: patient compliance, taste, and acceptability.
Methods: A prospective audit of patient experience of taking bowel preparation and blinded colonic scoring assessment of bowel cleansing of each of the tested regimes.
Results: A total of 258 (female,138; 53.5%) patients were recruited, 91 in the KleanPrep group (F:45, 49.5%), 86 patients in the Moviprep group (female, 45; 52.3%), and 81 in the Senna/Citramag group (female, 44; 54.3%). Significantly more patients were unable to take the prescribed dose of KleanPrep when compared with the other 2 regimes (19.6%; P<0.0001 vs. Moviprep; P<0.0001 vs. Senna/Citramag). A total of 45.65% of patients reported KleanPrep as tasting unpleasant. This was significantly more than both Moviprep (10.47%; P=0.008) and Senna/Citramag (9.88%; P<0.0001). The overall cleansing efficacy across the 3 groups (those with grades A or B) was 73.9%, 74.5%, and 86.5% for KleanPrep, Moviprep, and Senna/Citramag, respectively. In this series Senna/Citramag proved significantly better at bowel cleansing than KleanPrep (P<0.05) and it showed a trend toward better cleansing when compared with Moviprep (P=0.08).
Limitations: Nonrandomized trial. Split-dosing regime for morning and afternoon lists may have confounded results.
Conclusions: In summary, low-volume PEG (Moviprep) and Senna/Citramag combination were better tolerated than large volume PEG with Senna/Citramag providing superior mucosal cleansing.
Similar articles
-
'Pico-Bello-Klean study': effectiveness and patient tolerability of bowel preparation agents sodium picosulphate-magnesium citrate and polyethylene glycol before colonoscopy. A single-blinded randomized trial.Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015 Jan;27(1):29-38. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000000192. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015. PMID: 25426978 Clinical Trial.
-
Administration of olive oil followed by a low volume of polyethylene glycol-electrolyte lavage solution improves patient satisfaction with right-side colonic cleansing over administration of the conventional volume of polyethylene glycol-electrolyte lavage solution for colonoscopy preparation.Gastrointest Endosc. 2009 Sep;70(3):515-21. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2009.01.002. Epub 2009 Jun 24. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009. PMID: 19555936 Clinical Trial.
-
High-dose senna compared with conventional PEG-ES lavage as bowel preparation for elective colonoscopy: a prospective, randomized, investigator-blinded trial.Am J Gastroenterol. 2005 Dec;100(12):2674-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2005.00335.x. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005. PMID: 16393219 Clinical Trial.
-
Sodium picosulfate/magnesium citrate: a review of its use as a colorectal cleanser.Drugs. 2009;69(1):123-36. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200969010-00009. Drugs. 2009. PMID: 19192941 Review.
-
Optimizing colonoscopy preparation: the role of dosage, timing and diet.Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2012 Sep;15(5):499-504. doi: 10.1097/MCO.0b013e328356b77b. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2012. PMID: 22797571 Review.
Cited by
-
One-day oral polyethylene glycol based cleanout is effective for pre-colonoscopy preparation in children.BMC Gastroenterol. 2018 Nov 7;18(1):170. doi: 10.1186/s12876-018-0895-7. BMC Gastroenterol. 2018. PMID: 30404598 Free PMC article.
-
A Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating a Low-Volume PEG Solution Plus Ascorbic Acid versus Standard PEG Solution in Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy.Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2015;2015:326581. doi: 10.1155/2015/326581. Epub 2015 Nov 15. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2015. PMID: 26649036 Free PMC article.
-
Cleansing efficacy and safety of bowel preparation protocol using sodium picosulfate/magnesium citrate considering subjective experiences: An observational study.World J Clin Cases. 2021 May 26;9(15):3586-3596. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i15.3586. World J Clin Cases. 2021. PMID: 34046458 Free PMC article.
-
Randomized controlled trial of low-volume bowel preparation agents for colonic bowel preparation: 2-L polyethylene glycol with ascorbic acid versus sodium picosulfate with magnesium citrate.Int J Colorectal Dis. 2015 Feb;30(2):251-8. doi: 10.1007/s00384-014-2066-9. Epub 2014 Nov 20. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2015. PMID: 25410648 Clinical Trial.
-
Posterior sagittal anorectoplasty in vestibular fistula: with or without colostomy.Pediatr Surg Int. 2017 Jul;33(7):755-759. doi: 10.1007/s00383-017-4102-7. Epub 2017 Jun 5. Pediatr Surg Int. 2017. PMID: 28584904
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical