A pilot study assessing adherence to auto-bilevel following a poor initial encounter with CPAP
- PMID: 22334808
- PMCID: PMC3266339
- DOI: 10.5664/jcsm.1658
A pilot study assessing adherence to auto-bilevel following a poor initial encounter with CPAP
Abstract
Study objectives: We hypothesized that early intervention with an auto bilevel device would improve treatment adherence compared to CPAP among OSA patients with a poor initial experience with lab-based CPAP titration.
Methods: Patients with a poor initial CPAP experience were recruited for this parallel group, randomized, double-blind, controlled pilot study. After an in-lab titration, patients were randomized with either an auto-bilevel device or CPAP. Treatment adherence and functioning were assessed at 90 days.
Results: We enrolled 51 subjects, with 47 completing the protocol. Groups were equally matched for gender, age, education, and OSA severity. There was no significant difference in the proportion of compliant subjects (≥ 4 h/night) between the auto bilevel and CPAP groups (62% vs. 54%; p = 0.624) after 90 days of use. Functional outcomes significantly improved in both groups during treatment use (p < 0.001) but did not differ between groups.
Conclusions: There was no statistically significant difference in adherence between the auto bilevel and CPAP groups in this study. Patients with a poor initial CPAP exposure may still achieve an acceptable long-term clinical outcome. Both groups demonstrated comparably significant improvements in functional outcomes, sleepiness, and fatigue complaints over the treatment period. CLINICAL TRIALS INFORMATION: NCT00635206 ClinicalTrials.gov
Keywords: Treatment compliance; bilevel positive airway pressure; continuous positive airway pressure; lung; obstructive sleep apnea.
Comment in
-
The quest to improve CPAP adherence--PAP potpourri is not the answer.J Clin Sleep Med. 2012 Feb 15;8(1):49-50. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.1660. J Clin Sleep Med. 2012. PMID: 22334809 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Driving on "auto": hands-on is more effective than hands-free.J Clin Sleep Med. 2012 Jun 15;8(3):343-4. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.1934. J Clin Sleep Med. 2012. PMID: 22701395 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Stepnowsky C, Moore P. Nasal CPAP treatment for obstructive sleep apnea: developing a new perspective on dosing strategies and compliance. J Psychosom Res. 2003;54:599–605. - PubMed
-
- Weaver TE, Kribbs NB, Pack AI, et al. Night-to-night variability in CPAP use over the first three months of treatment. Sleep. 1997;20:278–83. - PubMed
-
- Budhiraja R, Parthasarathy S, Drake CL, et al. Early CPAP use identifies subsequent adherence to CPAP therapy. Sleep. 2007;30:320–4. - PubMed
-
- Drake CL, Day R, Hudgel D, et al. Sleep during titration predicts continuous positive airway pressure compliance. Sleep. 2003;26:308–11. - PubMed
-
- Randerath WJ, Schraeder O, Galetke W, et al. Autoadjusting CPAP therapy based on impedance efficacy, compliance, and acceptance. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2001;163:652–57. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
