Upgrading and downgrading of prostate cancer from biopsy to radical prostatectomy: incidence and predictive factors using the modified Gleason grading system and factoring in tertiary grades
- PMID: 22336380
- PMCID: PMC4659370
- DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.01.050
Upgrading and downgrading of prostate cancer from biopsy to radical prostatectomy: incidence and predictive factors using the modified Gleason grading system and factoring in tertiary grades
Abstract
Background: Prior studies assessing the correlation of Gleason score (GS) at needle biopsy and corresponding radical prostatectomy (RP) predated the use of the modified Gleason scoring system and did not factor in tertiary grade patterns.
Objective: To assess the relation of biopsy and RP grade in the largest study to date.
Design, setting, and participants: A total of 7643 totally embedded RP and corresponding needle biopsies (2004-2010) were analyzed according to the updated Gleason system.
Interventions: All patients underwent prostate biopsy prior to RP.
Measurements: The relation of upgrading or downgrading to patient and cancer characteristics was compared using the chi-square test, Student t test, and multivariable logistic regression.
Results and limitations: A total of 36.3% of cases were upgraded from a needle biopsy GS 5-6 to a higher grade at RP (11.2% with GS 6 plus tertiary). Half of the cases had matching GS 3+4=7 at biopsy and RP with an approximately equal number of cases downgraded and upgraded at RP. With biopsy GS 4+3=7, RP GS was almost equally 3+4=7 and 4+3=7. Biopsy GS 8 led to an almost equal distribution between RP GS 4+3=7, 8, and 9-10. A total of 58% of the cases had matching GS 9-10 at biopsy and RP. In multivariable analysis, increasing age (p<0.0001), increasing serum prostate-specific antigen level (p<0.0001), decreasing RP weight (p<0.0001), and increasing maximum percentage cancer/core (p<0.0001) predicted the upgrade from biopsy GS 5-6 to higher at RP. Despite factoring in multiple variables including the number of positive cores and the maximum percentage of cancer per core, the concordance indexes were not sufficiently high to justify the use of nomograms for predicting upgrading and downgrading for the individual patient.
Conclusions: Almost 20% of RP cases have tertiary patterns. A needle biopsy can sample a tertiary higher Gleason pattern in the RP, which is then not recorded in the standard GS reporting, resulting in an apparent overgrading on the needle biopsy.
Copyright © 2012 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Utility of Gleason pattern 4 morphologies detected on transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided biopsies for prediction of upgrading or upstaging in Gleason score 3 + 4 = 7 prostate cancer.Virchows Arch. 2016 Sep;469(3):313-9. doi: 10.1007/s00428-016-1981-2. Epub 2016 Jul 10. Virchows Arch. 2016. PMID: 27394432
-
Multiparametric MRI to Predict Gleason Score Upgrading and Downgrading at Radical Prostatectomy Compared to Presurgical Biopsy.Korean J Radiol. 2025 May;26(5):422-434. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2024.1008. Epub 2025 Mar 21. Korean J Radiol. 2025. PMID: 40169496 Free PMC article.
-
Downgrading of biopsy based Gleason score in prostatectomy specimens.J Clin Pathol. 2014 Apr;67(4):313-8. doi: 10.1136/jclinpath-2012-201323. Epub 2013 Oct 29. J Clin Pathol. 2014. PMID: 24403214
-
The 2019 Genitourinary Pathology Society (GUPS) White Paper on Contemporary Grading of Prostate Cancer.Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2021 Apr 1;145(4):461-493. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2020-0015-RA. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2021. PMID: 32589068 Review.
-
Contemporary Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma: An Update With Discussion on Practical Issues to Implement the 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma.Am J Surg Pathol. 2017 Apr;41(4):e1-e7. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000000820. Am J Surg Pathol. 2017. PMID: 28177964
Cited by
-
Concordance in Biomarker Status Between Bladder Tumors at Time of Transurethral Resection and Subsequent Radical Cystectomy: Results of a 5-year Prospective Study.Bladder Cancer. 2016 Jan 7;2(1):91-99. doi: 10.3233/BLC-150036. Bladder Cancer. 2016. PMID: 27376130 Free PMC article.
-
The role of 3-tesla diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in selecting prostate cancer patients for active surveillance.Prostate Int. 2014 Dec;2(4):169-75. doi: 10.12954/PI.14057. Epub 2014 Dec 30. Prostate Int. 2014. PMID: 25599072 Free PMC article.
-
Investigating the role of DCE-MRI, over T2 and DWI, in accurate PI-RADS v2 assessment of clinically significant peripheral zone prostate lesions as defined at radical prostatectomy.Abdom Radiol (NY). 2019 Apr;44(4):1520-1527. doi: 10.1007/s00261-018-1807-6. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2019. PMID: 30361870 Free PMC article.
-
Concordance of cribriform architecture in matched prostate cancer biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens.Histopathology. 2019 Sep;75(3):338-345. doi: 10.1111/his.13893. Epub 2019 Aug 2. Histopathology. 2019. PMID: 31045262 Free PMC article.
-
Prostate zones and cancer: lost in transition?Nat Rev Urol. 2022 Feb;19(2):101-115. doi: 10.1038/s41585-021-00524-7. Epub 2021 Oct 19. Nat Rev Urol. 2022. PMID: 34667303 Review.
References
-
- Fine SW, Epstein JI. A contemporary study correlating prostate needle biopsy and radical prostatectomy Gleason score. J Urol. 2008;179:1335–8. - PubMed
-
- Epstein JI, Allsbrook WC, Jr, Amin MB, Egevad LL. The 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 2005;29:1228–42. - PubMed
-
- Amin A, Partin AW, Epstein JI. Gleason score 7 prostate cancer on needle biopsy: relation of primary pattern 3 or 4 to pathological stage and progression after radical prostatectomy. J Urol. 2011;286:1286–90. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical