Evaluation of zirconium-oxide-based ceramic single-unit posterior fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) generated with two CAD/CAM systems compared to porcelain-fused-to-metal single-unit posterior FDPs: a 5-year clinical prospective study
- PMID: 22339945
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2011.00825.x
Evaluation of zirconium-oxide-based ceramic single-unit posterior fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) generated with two CAD/CAM systems compared to porcelain-fused-to-metal single-unit posterior FDPs: a 5-year clinical prospective study
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this prospective clinical study was to determine the success rate of single-unit posterior fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) with zirconia copings generated with two CAD/CAM systems, compared to porcelain-fused-to-metal (PFM) single-unit posterior FDPs after 5 years of function.
Materials and methods: From 2005 to 2006, 60 patients who needed a single-unit FDP on a first molar in the mandibular jaw (left or right) in a private office setting were included in this study. The 60 first mandibular molars were randomly divided into three groups (n = 20): in the control group (group C), 20 PFM FDPs were included. In the other two groups CAD/CAM technology was used for the fabrication of the zirconium-oxide copings: 20 single-unit posterior FDPs with zirconia copings were generated with the Procera system (group P, Nobel Biocare); 20 single-unit posterior FDPs with zirconia copings were generated with the Lava system (group L, 3M ESPE). For the ANOVA follow-up data, the clinical life table method was applied. The statistical analysis was performed using two nonparametric tests, the log-rank test for k-groups and the Fisher exact test.
Results: No statistically significant difference in the clinical outcome of zirconia-ceramic FDPs of both groups (P and L) evaluated together and metal-ceramic posterior single FDPs was found at 5 years of function; however, clinical data showed that technical problems, such as extended fracture of the veneering ceramic, tended to occur more frequently in the zirconia-ceramic FDP groups. The difference in the frequency of failure was statistically significant only in the comparison of groups C and P.
Conclusions: Even if no statistically significant difference in the clinical outcome of zirconia-ceramic FDPs of both groups (P and L) considered together and metal-ceramic posterior single FDPs was found at 5 years of function, clinical data showed that the two zirconia-ceramic FDP groups tended to have more frequent clinical problems: for this reason all the clinical and technical variables related to the use of zirconia-ceramic FDPs generated with CAD/CAM systems should be carefully considered prior to all treatment procedures.
© 2012 by the American College of Prosthodontists.
Similar articles
-
A comparison of the marginal vertical discrepancies of zirconium and metal ceramic posterior fixed dental prostheses before and after cementation.J Prosthet Dent. 2009 Dec;102(6):378-84. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(09)60198-0. J Prosthet Dent. 2009. PMID: 19961996
-
Retrievable metal ceramic implant-supported fixed prostheses with milled titanium frameworks and all-ceramic crowns: retrospective clinical study with up to 10 years of follow-up.J Prosthodont. 2012 Jun;21(4):256-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2011.00824.x. Epub 2012 Feb 19. J Prosthodont. 2012. PMID: 22339902
-
A four-year prospective clinical evaluation of zirconia and metal-ceramic posterior fixed dental prostheses.Int J Prosthodont. 2012 Sep-Oct;25(5):451-8. Int J Prosthodont. 2012. PMID: 22930766 Clinical Trial.
-
Current status of zirconia restoration.J Prosthodont Res. 2013 Oct;57(4):236-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jpor.2013.09.001. Epub 2013 Oct 18. J Prosthodont Res. 2013. PMID: 24140561 Review.
-
Survival of zirconia- and metal-supported fixed dental prostheses: a systematic review.Int J Prosthodont. 2010 Nov-Dec;23(6):493-502. Int J Prosthodont. 2010. PMID: 21209982
Cited by
-
Monolithic zirconia crowns: effect of thickness reduction on fatigue behavior and failure load.J Adv Prosthodont. 2021 Oct;13(5):269-280. doi: 10.4047/jap.2021.13.5.269. Epub 2021 Oct 27. J Adv Prosthodont. 2021. PMID: 34777717 Free PMC article.
-
Seven-year prospective clinical study on zirconia-based single crowns and fixed dental prostheses.Clin Oral Investig. 2015 Jun;19(5):1137-45. doi: 10.1007/s00784-014-1330-2. Epub 2014 Oct 12. Clin Oral Investig. 2015. PMID: 25304166
-
Fracture Strength of Aged Monolithic and Bilayer Zirconia-Based Crowns.Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:418641. doi: 10.1155/2015/418641. Epub 2015 Oct 21. Biomed Res Int. 2015. PMID: 26576423 Free PMC article.
-
Alternative Treatments for Zirconium Oxide to Compare Commonly Used Surface Treatments to Determine Which Has the Least Effect on the Phase Transformation.Materials (Basel). 2024 Oct 24;17(21):5175. doi: 10.3390/ma17215175. Materials (Basel). 2024. PMID: 39517458 Free PMC article.
-
Do tooth-supported zirconia restorations present more technical failures related to fracture or loss of retention? Systematic review and meta-analysis.Clin Oral Investig. 2022 Aug;26(8):5129-5142. doi: 10.1007/s00784-022-04573-z. Epub 2022 Jun 4. Clin Oral Investig. 2022. PMID: 35660957
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous