Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Feb 16:4:3.
doi: 10.1186/1758-3284-4-3.

A decision support system for quality of life in head and neck oncology patients

Joaquim J Gonçalves  1 , Alvaro M Rocha
Affiliations

A decision support system for quality of life in head and neck oncology patients

Joaquim J Gonçalves et al. Head Neck Oncol. .

Expression of concern in

  • Comment: Head and Neck Oncology.
    BioMed Central. BioMed Central. BMC Med. 2014 Feb 5;12:24. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-12-24. BMC Med. 2014. PMID: 24499430 Free PMC article. Review.

Abstract

Background: The assessment of Quality of Life (QoL) is a Medical goal; it is used in clinical research, medical practice, health-related economic studies and in planning health management measures and strategies. The objective of this project is to develop an informational platform to achieve a patient self-assessment with standardized QoL measuring instruments, through friendly software, easy for the user to adapt, which should aid the study of QoL, by promoting the creation of databases and accelerating its statistical treatment and yet generating subsequent useful results in graphical format for the physician analyzes in an appointment immediately after the answers collection.

Methods: First, a software platform was designed and developed in an action-research process with patients, physicians and nurses. The computerized patient self-assessment with standardized QoL measuring instruments was compared with traditional one, to verify if its use did not influence the patient's answers. For that, the Wilcoxon and t-Student tests were applied. After, we adopted and adapted the mathematic Rash model to make possible the use of QoL measure in the routine appointments.

Results: The results show that the computerized patient self-assessment does not influence the patient's answers and can be used as a suitable tool in the routine appointment, because indicates problems which are more difficult to identify in a traditional appointment, improving thus the physician's decisions.

Conclusions: The possibility of representing graphically useful results that physician needs to analyze in the appointment, immediately after the answer collection, in an useful time, makes this QoL assessment platform a diagnosis instrument ready to be used routinely in clinical practice.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
View of the QoL screen.
Figure 2
Figure 2
View of the patient when answering the questionnaire.
Figure 3
Figure 3
QLQ-C30 Answers Comparison.
Figure 4
Figure 4
QLQ-HN35 Answers Comparison.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Patient's preferences by patient utilization level.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Graphic with patient's answers.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Pimentel FL. Qualidade de Vida do Doente Oncológico. Edição: De autor; 2003.
    1. Schottenfeld D, Fraumeni JF. Cancer epidemiology and Prevention. New York: Oxford University Press; 1996.
    1. Stewart BW, Kleihues P. World Cancer Report. IARC Press; 2003.
    1. Rodrigues VC. Oral cancer in the UK: to screen or not to screen. Oral Oncology. 1998;34:454–465. doi: 10.1016/S1368-8375(98)00052-9. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Caçador M, Adónis C, Pacheco RE, Estibeiro H, e Olias J. Quality of life on the laryngeal preservation protocol-methods of evaluation. Rev Port Otorrinolaringol. 2001;42(4):305–313.

Publication types