Adenoma detection rates vary minimally with time of day and case rank: a prospective study of 2139 first screening colonoscopies
- PMID: 22341102
- DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.11.021
Adenoma detection rates vary minimally with time of day and case rank: a prospective study of 2139 first screening colonoscopies
Abstract
Background: Adenoma detection rate is an important measure of colonoscopy quality; however, factors including procedure order that contribute to adenoma detection are incompletely understood.
Objective: The aim of this study was to prospectively evaluate factors associated with adenoma detection rate.
Design: Prospective cohort study. Data were collected on patient and physician characteristics, trainee participation, time of day, and case rank.
Setting: Outpatient tertiary-care center.
Patients: This study involved consecutive patients presenting for first screening colonoscopies.
Main outcome measurements: Adenoma and polyp detection rates (proportion of cases with one or more lesion detected) and ratios (mean number of lesions detected per case).
Results: A total of 2139 colonoscopies were performed by 32 gastroenterologists. Detection rates were 42.7% for all polyps, 25.4% for adenomas, and 5.0% for advanced adenomas. Adenoma detection was associated with male sex and increasing age on multivariate analysis. In the overall study cohort, time of day and case rank were not significantly associated with detection rates. In post hoc analysis, polyp and adenoma detection rates appeared lower after the fifth case of the day for endoscopists with low volumes of cases and after the tenth case of the day for endoscopists with high volumes of cases.
Limitation: Single center.
Conclusion: Overall, time of day and case rank did not influence adenoma detection rate. We observed a small but significant decrease in detection rates in later procedures, which was dependent on physician typical procedure volume. These findings imply that colonoscopy quality in general is stable throughout the day; however, there may be a novel "stamina effect" for some endoscopists, and interventions aimed at improving colonoscopy quality need to take individual physician practice styles into consideration.
Copyright © 2012 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
The impact of video recording colonoscopy on adenoma detection rates.Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Jan;75(1):127-33. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.07.048. Epub 2011 Oct 1. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012. PMID: 21963062
-
Differences in proximal serrated polyp detection among endoscopists are associated with variability in withdrawal time.Gastrointest Endosc. 2013 Apr;77(4):617-23. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.10.018. Epub 2013 Jan 12. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013. PMID: 23321338
-
The effect of colonoscopy preparation quality on adenoma detection rates.Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Mar;75(3):545-53. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.09.022. Epub 2011 Dec 3. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012. PMID: 22138085
-
Colonoscopy: a review of its yield for cancers and adenomas by indication.Am J Gastroenterol. 1995 Mar;90(3):353-65. Am J Gastroenterol. 1995. PMID: 7872270 Review.
-
Can technology increase adenoma detection rate?Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2018 Jan 10;11:1756283X17746311. doi: 10.1177/1756283X17746311. eCollection 2018. Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2018. PMID: 29383029 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Morning colonoscopies are associated with improved adenoma detection rates.Surg Endosc. 2016 May;30(5):1796-803. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4448-7. Epub 2015 Jul 22. Surg Endosc. 2016. PMID: 26198158
-
Rates of Duodenal Biopsy During Upper Endoscopy Differ Widely Between Providers: Implications for Diagnosis of Celiac Disease.J Clin Gastroenterol. 2019 Feb;53(2):e61-e67. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000000957. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2019. PMID: 29095420 Free PMC article.
-
Time-of-day variation in the diagnostic quality of screening colonoscopies: a registry-based study.Ann Gastroenterol. 2021 Nov-Dec;34(6):815-819. doi: 10.20524/aog.2021.0668. Epub 2021 Oct 12. Ann Gastroenterol. 2021. PMID: 34815647 Free PMC article.
-
Development and validation of the PROcedural Sedation Assessment Survey (PROSAS) for assessment of procedural sedation quality.Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Jan;81(1):194-203.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.07.062. Epub 2014 Oct 5. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015. PMID: 25293829 Free PMC article.
-
What Can We Do to Optimize Colonoscopy and How Effective Can We Be?Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2016 Jun;18(6):27. doi: 10.1007/s11894-016-0500-6. Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2016. PMID: 27098814 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical